Sean Murphy's research deserves more

[Albert Doyle]

A man who hides behind the Frazier canard answers his being called on it by demanding answers to the Frazier canard while ignoring everything else I said.


No, if you read what I wrote it's your move. The chessboard says you are in no position to be asking questions.


That's what I love about you Bob. You assume a position of demanding authority that you haven't earned through your material.


Specifically and directly answer the bottleneck point you're avoiding with your question please.

[Bob Prudhomme]

A man who hides behind the Frazier canard answers his being called on it by demanding answers to the Frazier canard while ignoring everything else I said.


No, if you read what I wrote it's your move. The chessboard says you are in no position to be asking questions.


That's what I love about you Bob. You assume a position of demanding authority that you haven't earned through your material.


Specifically and directly answer the bottleneck point you're avoiding with your question please.

In other words, Albert, Frazier not being able to identify Prayer Man as Oswald or as anyone else is a major stumbling block to your theory, isn't it.

If Frazier did not recognize PM, why not just say so?

[Albert Doyle]

It doesn't make sense that if Sean Murphy had the key to the whole assassination in his hand that he would just abandon it and walk away. That doesn't fit the human psychology profile of a person who had the case-cracking solution to the assassination. A person who really believed he had the answer would stick to it to the end and see it through responsibly in order to live up to the significance of the discovery. He would stand up against the trolls and naysayers with what he knew was the truth and not take anything else as an answer.

Don't look at what someone says, look at what they do.

[Bob Prudhomme]

It doesn't make sense that if Sean Murphy had the key to the whole assassination in his hand that he would just abandon it and walk away. That doesn't fit the human psychology profile of a person who had the case-cracking solution to the assassination. A person who really believed he had the answer would stick to it to the end and see it through responsibly in order to live up to the significance of the discovery. He would stand up against the trolls and naysayers with what he knew was the truth and not take anything else as an answer.

Don't look at what someone says, look at what they do.

Uh, you're changing the subject, Albert; precisely what you just accused me of doing.

BTW, how do you know if Sean Murphy is even alive still?

[Albert Doyle]

In other words, Albert, Frazier not being able to identify Prayer Man as Oswald or as anyone else is a major stumbling block to your theory, isn't it.

If Frazier did not recognize PM, why not just say so?

You sound like somebody who is using the Frazier canard to ignore everything else. Meanwhile there's no reason why Frazier just could have not remembered a non-descript woman he had no reason to remember.


No answer from Bob for the bottleneck or the notch. I find that rather arrogant from a person who calls others idiots.

[Bob Prudhomme]

"You sound like somebody who is using the Frazier canard to ignore everything else. Meanwhile there's no reason why Frazier just could have not remembered a non-descript woman he had no reason to remember."

You just answered the bottleneck question for yourself, Albert. If Frazier was standing beside PM, for possibly several minutes or more, and looking directly at PM for the duration of the Couch film, and could NOT remember PM simply because she was "a non-descript woman he had no reason to remember", why would the people re-entering the TSBD remember her? Also, they would all be distracted by the commotion they had just seen and would have been discussing it amongst themselves, and they would only have been in the vicinity of PM for a second or two before they were in the building. It was not as if PM was standing directly in front of the door. PM was tucked into the corner on the west side of the steps, completely out of the way of re-entering employees.

You want to talk about a bottleneck? How many witnesses on the steps saw Officer Marrion Baker, wearing a white motorcycle helmet, enter the TSBD?

[Bart Kamp]

.

[Albert Doyle]

Parker is a textbook case of believing your own bullshit. He's saying that he would have to be convinced that Carolyn Arnold knew the motorcade was running late before he would accept the Golz version.


This is why I call Parker a psychopath. He is in such thick-skulled denial that even when it is spelled out to him at length that, 15 years after the assassination, when she spoke to Golz, there's simply no way that Carolyn Arnold would not have known the shooting occurred at 12:30. That's 15 years of being exposed to the common knowledge in all printed sources that JFK was shot at 12:30. Yet, unbelievably, Parker is still so bound by his self-blinding denial that he is asking to be convinced that Carolyn Arnold had that knowledge when she said 12:25 to Golz.


Parker's comment is somewhat moronic considering how easily it is shown to be in contempt of the undeniable. This just shows the major flaws in Parker's thinking process caused by blowing too hard with too little competent peer input. He actually argues himself into self-destruction without even detecting the stupidity of it. Parker is actually out there suggesting that after 15 years of exposure to the information around the assassination that showed Kennedy was shot at 12:30 he still needs to be convinced Carolyn Arnold knew the motorcade was running late when she told Golz 12:25.


This man is hopeless and should not be taken seriously.


Greg, stop building. Your foundation is smashed.

[Bob Prudhomme]

Did my last post make too much sense? Is that why it went uncontested?

[Albert Doyle]

You just answered the bottleneck question for yourself, Albert. If Frazier was standing beside PM, for possibly several minutes or more, and looking directly at PM for the duration of the Couch film, and could NOT remember PM simply because she was "a non-descript woman he had no reason to remember", why would the people re-entering the TSBD remember her? Also, they would all be distracted by the commotion they had just seen and would have been discussing it amongst themselves, and they would only have been in the vicinity of PM for a second or two before they were in the building. It was not as if PM was standing directly in front of the door. PM was tucked into the corner on the west side of the steps, completely out of the way of re-entering employees.

You want to talk about a bottleneck? How many witnesses on the steps saw Officer Marrion Baker, wearing a white motorcycle helmet, enter the TSBD?

That's not true. If Prayer Man was Oswald he slipped inside shortly after Darnell since that's the last we see of him. There was a crowd in the doorway at that time.

I'm not sure what you're arguing here? We're not talking about the woman who was Prayer Man we're talking about Lee Harvey Oswald who shortly after became one of the most famous people in America. I don't know if you're trying to be cute but the woman who Duncan discovered and Oswald are two entirely different deals. So you once again haven't really answered the point. If Oswald was Prayer Man the point where he had to re-enter was crowded in the doorway. There's no way he would not have been seen.


As for Baker Lovelady said he saw him going in. There are no witnesses to him doing anything else.