Clifton tape and Collins Radio Doug Horne

[Dawn Meredith]

What?

unless, of course, such usage may be appreciated for its intended deeper dramatic and/or thematic functions.

Closer now, you are to understand

Debate of this brings not an answer

Before us both were men we figure

What did they do, my words hold the plan



Your still lookin' good on Jenkins:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Diddo. WHAT????? You spoke in English for the first posts so we know you can use that language, you also made some intelligent points, now you type nonsense.
We don't play games here. You are perhaps in the wrong room?

Thanking you in advance for your next post making sense.

Dawn Meredith

[Albert Doyle]

Thank God to see this....I am sooooo sick of people saying Pitzer committed suicide.

People who think Pitzer committed suicide are either ill-informed, unstudied, cognitively impaired, or part of the conspiracy...

[Russ LaChapelle]

The new poster above who is critical of Doug's black ops presentation should take it all into context. Horne does not go far enough for him but he did not have to do any of this, look at the contrast to say Blakey-whom I consider a whore of the first degree. So I thank Doug Horne for his valuable service to this most important cause. From reading the review at Jim D's site I was very impressed, and look forward to getting his books.

Dawn...
These words are well spoken, I hear you and agree

The whole of this is those before us and history plays this as true. The examination of the JFK assassination has been being tweaked and nudged, tweaked and nudged into what is, oh so close at hand. We are all but certain messengers with points almost there, this is my tweak and nudge, to all who care and share.


I point only onto an aspect which needs nothing more than an application of the brakes... slow the car down... take a little closer look at the scenery. This is nothing more, on my part, to use as example, the same as was done before us by Lane, Brussell, and Weisburg. Len's work and place for our ears, is the bestest thing we got... IMHO Wer'e livin' in the day of the eagle not the dove.

[Charles Drago]

Yoda man.

[Phil Dragoo]

In my view Pitzer represents a dark line including Gary Webb.

John Millis.

George DeMohrenschildt.

Roger Craig.

David Ferrie.

Dan Marvin and his publisher won the suit filed against them by the SFA.

An overview of the questions as they stood a decade ago:

http://expendableelite.com/UW_archives/U....0004.html

The evidence in the Pitzer suspicious death might have been a topic for the ARRB had it not been a Wonderland Tea Party.

Bertrand Russell's query has never been satisfactorily addressed:

If it is a lone nut, no conspiracy, why all the national security mumbo jumbo.

Rechecking premises.

False premise located.

Conspiracy.

Can Stephen Hawking explain the arrival of the body before the bronze coffin.

How LeMay can be out of country until the funeral but present at the autopsy.

How enlisted men faced prison for the truth, but Blakey was at large for lying.

Blakey is shaving. A horn honks twice. His lathered face at the drape drains.

In the drive his hearse awaits.

Rinse. Repeat.

[Russ LaChapelle]

Yoda man.

Yes... it is, a war of stars

"We choose" spoken strongly lays course to the moon and beyond

Eisenhower weakened, this set forth destiny resolve thru Nixon before he came

Likened to monkeys with wings, the scream to the island nation compromised

From Russia with love, a stand off at sea is contained, that was the close one

LeMay is pissed off from power lost along with Dulles and the others, gone

Angleton, Angelton, Angleton calls out plan towards middle and to the right

Between T3 & T4, much time spent looking path stops near lung

It could be anywhere but nowhere is found

[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9UZz07eNMc&feature=plcp&context=C479f34bV DvjVQa1PpcFMDOskjDlMGhBxKFK-tou3qHTy50PDOdCc%3D[/video]

[Bernice Moore]

In my view Pitzer represents a dark line including Gary Webb.

John Millis.

George DeMohrenschildt.

Roger Craig.

David Ferrie.

Dan Marvin and his publisher won the suit filed against them by the SFA.

An overview of the questions as they stood a decade ago:

http://expendableelite.com/UW_archives/U....0004.html

The evidence in the Pitzer suspicious death might have been a topic for the ARRB had it not been a Wonderland Tea Party.

Bertrand Russell's query has never been satisfactorily addressed:

If it is a lone nut, no conspiracy, why all the national security mumbo jumbo.

Rechecking premises.

False premise located.

Conspiracy.

Can Stephen Hawking explain the arrival of the body before the bronze coffin.

How LeMay can be out of country until the funeral but present at the autopsy.

How enlisted men faced prison for the truth, but Blakey was at large for lying.

Blakey is shaving. A horn honks twice. His lathered face at the drape drains.

In the drive his hearse awaits.

Rinse. Repeat.

Phil;; Dan Marvin and his publisher won the suit filed against them by the SFA.Dan did not win his case, not according to what went down and the research, we need Allan's input on this one..best b ps i have contacted allan, as i am not up on all re dan and the like, so i really could be full of shite. really and it would not be the first time, either...b

[Phil Dragoo]

THE COURT: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, it's my understanding you've reached a unanimous verdict. I guess you're the foreperson, because you're carrying all the paperwork, right? Do you want to hand it to the marshal, please?

Do you want to do these, since they're all alike, the categories? We, the jury, unanimously find none of the plaintiffs proved defamation against Mr. Marvin, okay? Additionally, none of the plaintiffs proved defamation against Trine Day. Additionally, Mr. Marvin didn't prove defamation against any of the plaintiffs. Okay? Is that correct?

FOREPERSON: That's correct.

Court page 845. PDF page 54 of 56.

http://expendableelite.com/lawsuit2/1-30-06.pdf

The suit was brought by the plaintiffs alleging defamation which the jury found not proved.

The war the murdered president refused was fought over his dead body. And lost.

So much was lost.

Curiously the period when Marvin was in country was when the Chiefs went to the White House to ask Johnson's permission to mine Haiphong and bomb Hanoi.

His response was quick and left a lasting impression:

[URL="http://hnn.us/articles/34024.html"]http://hnn.us/articles/34024.html

[/URL]I found this story as a four-page article in Proceedings of the U.S. Naval Institute in the May 1996 edition.

And Col. Bui Tin explained the war Marvin had to fight in secret would've made the sacrifice worthwhile:


Q: How could the Americans have won the war?

A: Cut the Ho Chi Minh trail inside Laos. If Johnson had granted [Gen. William] Westmoreland's requests to enter Laos and block the Ho Chi Minh trail, Hanoi could not have won the war.

[URL="http://www.viet-myths.net/BuiTin.htm"]http://www.viet-myths.net/BuiTin.htm
[/URL]

The story of Dan Marvin touches upon the policy of assassination which the CIA sought to conceal, which was the source of perjured testimony to congress by no less than Richard Helms, a figure woven through the significant intrigues of deep political nature.

The suit failed to silence him. Though he has passed, his book remains.



[URL="http://expendableelite.com/lawsuit2/1-30-06.pdf"]
[/URL]

[Allan Eaglesham]

Dan Marvin claimed that the result of the lawsuit prosecuted against him by members of his "A" team was a glorious victory over the Special Forces Association, the Pentagon and the CIA. In fact, LTC Marvin's countersuit was thrown out along with the plaintiffs' (as Phil pointed out); it was a "no fault" verdict. In time, LTC Marvin toned down his rhetoric and stopped lumping in the Pentagon and the CIA. His only adversary -- apart from the members of his "A" team -- was the Special Forces Association, who paid the plaintiffs' expenses. In my opinion, the plaintiffs' lawyers took a much too casual approach. They thought an easy victory was coming down the pike, not bargaining for the jury seeing no problem in the plaintiffs being labelled as "heroes" when they felt they had done nothing to deserve that accolade.

As for LTC Marvin's 2002 comments on the Pitzer matter, most of them have since been addressed and the bottom line -- in my opinion -- is that there is no evidence of homicide:

http://www.manuscriptservice.com/Pitzer/

Expert appraisal of the death-scene and Pitzer-autopsy photographs:

http://www.manuscriptservice.com/WBP-Resolution/


Allan

[Albert Doyle]

As for LTC Marvin's 2002 comments on the Pitzer matter, most of them have since been addressed and the bottom line -- in my opinion -- is that there is no evidence of homicide:

Well if you ignore the overwhelming evidence that he was murdered by CIA because he filmed the wounds from the front -- I guess --. That is, if that's what you call "no evidence".


Meanwhile there's pathetically even much less evidence for suicide.


The Pitzer suits are a diversion tactic. Only in Amerikka would a brave man who stood up and defended America against fascist treason be subjected to lawsuits as a reward.