Posts: 2,430
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
I have unblocked several videos for your enjoyment, I hope that some of them may be informative, enjoy!
Scott Kaiser
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJXV6o5a...7usO-Ig11Q
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
[/FONT]This is an excellent book that provides key historical information relating to the assassination of President Kennedy, and to the Watergate scandal. The book is 248 pages long. It is written clearly and concisely, with only a few grammatical errors. This book is a biography of Edwin Kaiser, written by his son, Scott Kaiser. There are numerous photocopies of Edwin Kaiser writings provided as documentation throughout the book.[/FONT]
Edwin Kaiser was heavily involved in covert activities to overthrow Fidel Castro. Key associates of Edwin Kaiser were E. Howard Hunt, David Morales, and especially Frank Sturgis. Morales confessed to being involved in the assassination of JFK to Bob Walton.[/FONT] On the day Edwin Kaiser was (most likely) murdered in 1977, Edwin Kaiser played a tape recording to his thirteen year old son Scott. In the recording Frank Sturgis discusses Sturgis involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy. Frank Sturgis was a close family friend of the Kaisers. Scott Kaiser believes Frank Sturgis was behind the probable murder of his father.
[/FONT]In one of Edwin Kaisers "little black books", the name and phone number of Frank Sturgis and "Lee" (Lee Harvey Oswald) are listed together. A photocopy of this is provided in the book. [/FONT]Eugenio Martinez (one of the Watergate burglars) and Jose Pujol told Scott Kaiser that the CIA plotted two attempts to assassinate President Nixon. The plots fell apart when the designated patsy, Edwin Kaiser, backed out of the plots.[/FONT] Luis Posada told Scott Kaiser (recorded on camera) that James Files "was with the company" which Scott Kaiser interprets as meaning CIA or Operation 40.[/FONT]
There is much, much more information in this book, along with extensive documentation. I give this book a five star rating. It takes courage to write a book on these subjects. The CIA paid disinformation specialists will respond for sure.[/FONT]
Posts: 14
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Scott,
I just sent a check for a copy of your book. Glad you are here at the forum and thanks for all your incredible insight and courage.::trenchcoatspy::
Tom Huston
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Thank you for the nice review, and thank you Tom.
Scott
Posts: 5,375
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
"it's hard fighting the CIA, you won't win". All I can say is that the CIA is going to pay their best disinformation agent to discredit my book. However, they are in for an impossible task.
Get the book now, the hottest item of books being sold this year. I didn't want to give the CIA any reason they would deny the covert operations carried out daily by rogue agents of the CIA that understood, and knew how to take matters into their own hands.
Some of the most notorious assassins, and operative shot callers are listed in my father's little black book. For the first ever, I release them all. Including never before seen writings in my father's hand and Howard S. Liebengood documents.
My testimony of what my father shared with me as a thirteen year old child. I didn't know who my father was. The truth is, I just learned about who my father was seven years ago which still has me in awe. (I always believed that my father worked at a junkyard, boy, was I surprised to find out the truth).
When my father told me about Frank's involvement with JFK. I didn't know who JFK was. Now, that I think about it, I don't remember ever hearing any of my teachers speak or teach about JFK in school as I was growing up in Miami.
I did know who Nixon was, and after Watergate our family pretty much was torn apart, just after Watergate broke, my father took off to Haiti and stayed at Mike Mclaney's hotel.
So you see, this is a one of a kind book that tells the whole story, and the only thing the CIA paid disinfo agents can do, is ignore the book.
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Here's a bit of information most folks don't even know, so many researchers are too quick to blame Allen Dulles as being at the top of the suspect list in his involvement in Kennedy's assassination, and I'll be the first to tell you it's all hogwash!
What most folks don't know is, had the Bay of Pigs been a successful mission rather than a failure, Dulles was already planning his retirement from the CIA shortly thereafter, in fact, his release of his position by his Commander in Chief allowed Dulles to muster out with a pension.
Dulles was the longest standing DCI at the CIA before his release and [oversaw] the topple and coup of the 1954 Guatemalan, Operation Ajax, the overthrow of Iran's government, sounds familiar? LSD experiments on homeless people without relatives to report and the Bay of Pigs.
Just six years later, after serving on the Warren Commission, Dulles would die of complications he had already contracted early on, and it was because of his failing health that his service to the United States would come to an end after serving on the commission.
Year after year Mr. Dulles would contract the flu, and on top of that he smoked, a recipe for disaster, it was during his final years of his life that he contracted Influenza which was the corporate for his death.
So, when I hear from researchers tell me they believe Dulles was at the forefront of Kennedy's assassination, I always ask them, is it because Dulles was fired, and he didn't want to lose his job that made Dulles want to kill Kennedy? Get real.... smh....
Posts: 5,375
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Scott,
I don't want to insult you but you should be very careful offering that recklessly superficial view of Dulles in this room. It is somewhat conspicuously lacking in the necessary understanding of who and what Dulles was as well as his methods and interests. While I haven't read Devil's Chessboard I've read enough excerpts and discussions to get a good idea that you would be well advised to read that book and absorb its content before floating such a wildly irresponsible and blindly unseeking claim. You are well into Trejo territory here and walking on extremely thin ice as far as research credibility in my opinion. If one were to flirt with Mastermind labels outside of the Drago model it would be very tempting to designate Dulles as that person he is so drenched in evidence of guilt. So you should reconsider your ill-advised defense of him.
I think you might have serious evidence in your address book niche. You should be more protective of it by not risking your credibility with such claims. Anyone who downplays Dulles's motives is foolhardy in my opinion and not paying attention to some of the most serious avenues of the assassination and the players involved. Dulles is a very illuminated individual and embodiment of old school Intel order whose reach is not always directly apparent but whose results are and therefore evidence his role.
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Albert Doyle Wrote:Scott,
I don't want to insult you but you should be very careful offering that recklessly superficial view of Dulles in this room. It is somewhat conspicuously lacking in the necessary understanding of who and what Dulles was as well as his methods and interests. While I haven't read Devil's Chessboard I've read enough excerpts and discussions to get a good idea that you would be well advised to read that book and absorb its content before floating such a wildly irresponsible and blindly unseeking claim. You are well into Trejo territory here and walking on extremely thin ice as far as research credibility in my opinion. If one were to flirt with Mastermind labels outside of the Drago model it would be very tempting to designate Dulles as that person he is so drenched in evidence of guilt. So you should reconsider your ill-advised defense of him.
I think you might have serious evidence in your address book niche. You should be more protective of it by not risking your credibility with such claims. Anyone who downplays Dulles's motives is foolhardy in my opinion and not paying attention to some of the most serious avenues of the assassination and the players involved. Dulles is a very illuminated individual and embodiment of old school Intel order whose reach is not always directly apparent but whose results are and therefore evidence his role.
No worries, pretty hard to insult intelligence.
Posts: 2,131
Threads: 199
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2014
It wasn't just about the job, it was about pride, and the power and the influence that came with the job, and the fact that it was a young upstart President (who had in fact beaten Dulles' chosen candidate for the job) who finally slapped Dulles down. Dulles remained active in the CIA after he was fired. Devil's Chessboard does a reasonably good job of following his extra-curricular activities, including the fact that Dulles spent the weekend of the assassination at the Farm in Virginia, one of several ex-government types that were quietly whisked out of the public eye at that critical time.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
|