Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fifty Years Later
#1
A half century later the involved medical professionals still disagree on the location of the head entry wound and on the size and orientation of the back wound.
Reply
#2
In my opinion Lifton and Horne have the best explanation for that.
Reply
#3
Herbert Blenner Wrote:A half century later the involved medical professionals still disagree on the location of the head entry wound and on the size and orientation of the back wound.
It all depends on who is paying the medical professional. Just as with so called expert testimony at trials. You can always find a credentialed expert to support almost any position. Common sense tells us where those locations were.
Reply
#4
Gordon Gray Wrote:
Herbert Blenner Wrote:A half century later the involved medical professionals still disagree on the location of the head entry wound and on the size and orientation of the back wound.
It all depends on who is paying the medical professional. Just as with so called expert testimony at trials. You can always find a credentialed expert to support almost any position. Common sense tells us where those locations were.

How does common sense tell the location of the entry wound of the head?
Reply
#5
Clint Hill, despite his defense of the official story, is still insisting he saw a large hole in the back of JFK's head. Four times he describes it in his 2012 book, Mrs Kennedy and Me. As with John Connally (who never accepted the SBT), I wonder if anyone has ever explained to Hill the significance of what he saw.

From Vince Palamara's site:

On pages 290, 291, 305, and 306, Clint Hill states firmly, as he has many times in the past, that the BACK of JFK's head was gone, thus indicating that President Kennedy was shot from the front, as entrance wounds leave small holes, while exit wounds leave large holes. Page 290: "…blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president's head. The president's blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over meon my face, my clothes, in my hair." Page 291: "His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president's head." Page 305: (at the autopsy) "the wound in the upper-right rear of the head." Page 306: "It looked like somebody had flipped open the back of his head, stuck in an ice-cream scoop and removed a portion of the brain…"


Reply
#6
The brain the Commission presented in evidence did not possess such damage to the rear. It was almost completely intact back there.


At minimum an exhumation will show some sort of repair work or manipulation back there.



Time to start approaching CIA as the evidence-hiding criminal organization it is hiding behind false claims of national security.
Reply
#7
Albert Doyle Wrote:The brain the Commission presented in evidence did not possess such damage to the rear. It was almost completely intact back there.


At minimum an exhumation will show some sort of repair work or manipulation back there.



Time to start approaching CIA as the evidence-hiding criminal organization it is hiding behind false claims of national security.

The body was buried without the brain which the Commission never saw.
Reply
#8
The Commission had a full set of brain evidence including pictures of this bogus swapped brain. They lost and buried all of it, including the brain, when they realized they had trapped themselves.
Reply
#9
Herbert Blenner Wrote:A half century later the involved medical professionals still disagree on the location of the head entry wound and on the size and orientation of the back wound.



IDK Herbert - seems like ther were pretty sure back in 1964 - BIG hole in back, no hole in front. Avulsed skull bones in back, bullet hole over right eye

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6746&stc=1]


the only ones not coming clean are Humes and Boswell...

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6744&stc=1] [Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6745&stc=1]


Attached Files
.jpg   Headwound location.jpg (Size: 248.05 KB / Downloads: 12)
.jpg   Boswell Skull drawing and reality.jpg (Size: 365.83 KB / Downloads: 12)
.jpg   right temple hole from Fox images.jpg (Size: 701.41 KB / Downloads: 12)
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#10
The Commission itself did not "bury" the actual brain. On April 26, 1965, well after the release of the WC report (9/24/64), JFK's brain along with other autopsy material, such as tissue slides, was inventoried, then removed from the White House by Dr. Burkley under order of RFK (then still Attorney General) and sent to Evelyn Lincoln, who was then working in the National Archives. At some point subsequent to that, Robert made an appointment to see Evelyn Lincoln, came to the Archives, and went into the secure room containing the metal jar holding JFK's brain. It is unknown what happened to the brain after that, but it is my suspicion that RFK interred the brain with the other remains in a private ceremony (attended only by RFK, Ted, and Cardinal Cushing) on March 14, 1967, at the brand new Kennedy Memorial, which was publicly dedicated the following day, March 15, 1967. (The permanent Eternal Flame memorial had been under construction, and it had been known that the grave site would have to be moved, since mid- 1965) Presumably it is still there.

On October 31, 1966, the Kennedy family donated everything on Burkley's inventory list to the US Government, with the exception of the brain and other tissue slides.

Perhaps you meant "bury" in more of a figurative sense.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Reports on or from the Dallas or other Conferences Re: November 22 - 55 years ago!! Peter Lemkin 16 21,113 11-12-2018, 10:33 PM
Last Post: Don Jeffries
  Best JFK books of the last 2 years? Tracy Riddle 59 92,825 22-11-2018, 07:53 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Best Book on RFK in over 30 years Jim DiEugenio 16 27,793 09-01-2018, 07:53 PM
Last Post: Alan Ford
  JFK 100 Years Barry Keane 4 7,099 29-05-2017, 12:15 PM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  JFK 100 Years Barry Keane 0 2,901 07-05-2017, 06:15 PM
Last Post: Barry Keane
  "Fake news": isn't this what we've been saying for 50+ years? Martin White 1 3,675 23-02-2017, 07:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  JFK 99 Years Barry Keane 1 2,444 29-05-2016, 03:49 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  52 Years Later, the Cover-up Is Still Failing Jim Hargrove 3 3,889 23-11-2015, 08:07 PM
Last Post: Alan Ford
  No one being kept away as in Dealey Plaza -- but then it's been 150 years Joseph McBride 3 2,789 16-04-2015, 07:00 PM
Last Post: Joseph McBride
  50 Years Ago Today Albert Doyle 20 9,561 11-03-2015, 08:59 PM
Last Post: R.K. Locke

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)