Poking More Holes in Judyth Baker

[Albert Doyle]

To assume this likely is clutching at straws in the extreme.

Yet while offering the weakest case of anybody, based mostly on doubt, the doubters then ignore a passed polygraph that gave the nod to Yates seeing the hitch-hiker as the same guy in the backyard photo, and as the same guy shown on TV after the assassination. That's a confirmation in my book. It doesn't make sense that the polygraph would miss a whopper of a lie like that or the enormous stress involved in this grandiose hoax that ended up getting Yates committed. How could the polygraph give the mental trainwreck the doubters are portraying a pass? The behavior spoken of by FBI was behavior that would be registered on the sensitive sensors of the polygraph.

So far no doubter has answered this short of offering general information on polygraphs that doesn't really specifically apply to what is being argued here. The doubters are saying Yates had the mental ability to defraud the polygraph but didn't have the mental ability to avoid breaking down in front of FBI. That doesn't make sense and doesn't forensically match. What does make sense from all this evidence is that Yates saw what he said he had seen and was telling the truth.

Furthermore Yates rushed in to tell Dempsey Jones of his encounter right it after happened. Jones said Yates wanted to tell him an amazing coincidence happened because a hitch-hiker had initiated the same conversation Yates and Jones had had about shooting Kennedy on his visit with a high powered rifle from an office building. Statistically, once Jones confirmed this witnessing it is much more likely the included details were accurate as well. But this is all moot because Yates passed a lie detector test on his witnessing that the doubters have yet to admit. Also, FBI tried to defame Yates and got Jones to say Yates was a bragger and loudmouth as the opening statement in his testimony.



.