Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sean Murphy's research deserves more
If Oswald told Eddie Piper he was going up to eat in the 2nd floor lunch-room then he was probably sitting there eating like Carolyn Arnold indicated. If this was 12:15, as Parker suggests, then is it likely he ate his lunch dry, went down to the 1st floor, and then came back up for a Coke?


Parker, in his desperation to connect the dots in his favor, misses something very obvious and very important. If Carolyn Arnold did indeed mistake her 12:25 departure time from the Depository with her alleged 12:15 sighting of Oswald, why would she leave the Depository for good at 12:25? That's 5 minutes before the assassination and would, therefore, be leaving work without cause 5 minutes before the assumed cause Mr Parker is citing. This is not too bright detective work on Mr Parker's behalf, which is why he's uncredible. Incompetent, really. A goof who bombastically pretends sophistication while taking out a shotgun and blasting his own foot off. It's clear that Mr Parker is an ass who is used to getting away with murder on his ROKC troll site. However he wandered too far from his credulous sanctuary this time.


Meanwhile more credible/competent researchers will note that 12:25 conforms to leaving the 2nd floor office around 12:24. 12:25 also precisely conforms to Mrs Arnold seeing Oswald at 12:24 in the lunch-room on the way out, which would have her leaving the building around 12:25 and not returning. If Mr Parker had any speck of credibility and wasn't so desperate to string bullshit denial together he might have noticed the fatal gaffe he was making. He might have noticed that Mrs Arnold could not have left the 2nd floor office at 12:15 and then finally left the building for good at 12:25 - taking 10 minutes to cover a distance that took 1, 5 minutes before the motorcade even arrived.


To cinch this cascade of evidence falling in to place, this correct rendering of the chronology also makes Mrs Arnold's statement that she actually said 12:25 and FBI altered it to 12:15 literally correct. It means she isn't confusing anything and her protest was accurate. Mr Parker, however, ignores all this and calls FBI's criminal alteration "corroboration".



Finally, Mrs Arnold told Golz she did not see Oswald on the 1st floor. Parker, of course, ignores this and corrects her.


I thank Greg for his warm greeting from the Education Forum and wish him well at his ROKC assassination correction conference.


.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - by Albert Doyle - 18-09-2015, 05:22 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Dirty Research Community Under James Gordon Brian Doyle 1 130 21-02-2025, 05:59 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Schnapf Threatens Credibility Of JFK Research Brian Doyle 1 144 27-01-2025, 07:13 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Roger Odisio Plants Credibility Time Bomb At Heart Of CT Research Brian Doyle 8 2,001 07-06-2024, 06:18 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim Hargrove Chooses Politics Over Good Research Brian Doyle 0 498 12-01-2024, 10:17 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The JFK Research Community Is Responsible For This Brian Doyle 0 557 28-11-2023, 04:48 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  How The Education Forum Destroyed Credible JFK Research Brian Doyle 8 1,974 09-07-2023, 09:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 864 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  EXCELLENT Research on LHO & Ruth Hyde Paine [and family] - Linda Minor Peter Lemkin 15 41,135 29-07-2019, 08:06 PM
Last Post: Tom Scully
  JFK Research Methodology James Lateer 19 29,360 02-07-2018, 04:00 PM
Last Post: James Lateer
  Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! Richard Gilbride 15 13,492 01-02-2017, 12:18 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)