19-09-2015, 04:52 PM
David Healey:
Self-styled photo interpreters can't determine the lineage of the photos they work with, have never determined what generation image they are working with, do NOT disclaim their image interpretation and generation are simply negligent. Those who agree or disagree with their "photo intepretation" are sawing off the limb the interpreter is standing on, credibility is shot--a simple waste of bandwidth... fools-folly. Especially if one has a modicum of knowledge concerning film/phots related to this case.
How do you determine color of clothes or for that matter hair style in a seriously deformed b/w photo?
I think this is accurate about this imbroglio. It becomes a Rohrsach test with images that degraded.
But, John Mytton?
Self-styled photo interpreters can't determine the lineage of the photos they work with, have never determined what generation image they are working with, do NOT disclaim their image interpretation and generation are simply negligent. Those who agree or disagree with their "photo intepretation" are sawing off the limb the interpreter is standing on, credibility is shot--a simple waste of bandwidth... fools-folly. Especially if one has a modicum of knowledge concerning film/phots related to this case.
How do you determine color of clothes or for that matter hair style in a seriously deformed b/w photo?
I think this is accurate about this imbroglio. It becomes a Rohrsach test with images that degraded.
But, John Mytton?