Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sean Murphy's research deserves more
A certain psychopath who ran away and never answered how Carolyn Arnold could not know either 4 months or 15 years after the assassination that the shooting occurred at 12:30, is now once again playing God and insisting that all original witnesses answer to his contrived reality instead of being allowed to speak for themselves. There's simply no way that Carolyn Arnold did not know the shooting took place at 12:30 when she spoke to Golz. So therefore all rational analyzers would have to conclude her insisting she left the building at 12:25 was with the knowledge it was 5 minutes before the shooting, as Pauline Sanders confirmed and the psychopath's trustworthy FBI altered to 11:25. Mrs Reid's claim would make 11:25 very unlikely. But since the psychopath isn't interested in the truth he ignores it. He also ignores that in March 1964 Sanders confirmed it was 12:20. So her statement at the time was 12:25. That's 2 people who said 12:25.

This psychopath is used to answering people for them simply because his deceptive method relies on switching from what those persons are saying to his imposed psychopath's version. Something that needs to be done that way because it is so averse and inaccurate to the truth those pre-empted witnesses are making obvious. This same psychopath never wavered a bit or answered for the evidence of Carolyn Arnold being on the Depository corner at 12:40-12:45. Now he's back, without skipping a beat, serving another load of disingenuous made-up bs that grinds against the facts. It never dawns on that backwards prevaricator that it is he who directly uses the WC methods when he quotes sightings of Oswald on the 1st floor by Carolyn Arnold; disavowed 12:15 times in altered FBI reports; inaccurate, made-up interpretations of Carolyn Arnold's doings and motives; and other contrary assumptions that are purely a product of his deceitful resistance more than anything else.

What this psychopathic meglomaniac doesn't realize is Carolyn Arnold doesn't have to answer any of his obviously made-up bs. She just has to relate what she remembers with the alleged conflicts spelled out to her for explanation. You can already see what the prevaricator who trolls that others are "integrity free" has been forced to back off of. Once you disallow the muddying static this person uses to confuse the issue it becomes clear that Carolyn Arnold had a source for the motorcade's progress and left the Depository with just the right amount of time to catch it. 5 minutes is about right. If I'm not mistaken Mrs Reid was the admitted source. So therefore any honest detective would realize Mrs Reid's admission that the secretaries were aware of the motorcade's progress trumps the psychopath's strawmen that he uses to avoid the necessary conclusion. This is a good example of how the psychopath thinks. You see he can admit your point but then try to defeat it with irrelevancies. If you filter his bs, all that counts is, yes, they had a source for the motorcade's progress, so therefore Carolyn Arnold's 12:25 is very possible. After all, it is what she told Golz no matter how much this psychopath denies it. Without skipping a beat our psychopath doesn't admit this refutes his previous feeble "12:25 was the original scheduled time so Carolyn Arnold mistook it for the time she went home" bs. This person is a true psychopath because only a true psychopath would show evidence that Carolyn Arnold knew from Mrs Reid that the motorcade was late yet then claim she had no source to know it wasn't coming at the original scheduled 12:25 time. This psychopath also refuses to admit how that would relate to Carolyn Arnold's certain knowledge that the shooting happened at 12:30 or the relevant timing confirmed by this. The answer isn't "no", it's "yes" - we were informed by Mrs Reid so therefore we had knowledge the motorcade was 5 minutes late when we left the building at 12:25 .


Another question to Carolyn Arnold should be "Did Oswald look like a person who was about the shoot the president minutes later?"



.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - by Albert Doyle - 28-09-2015, 04:28 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Dirty Research Community Under James Gordon Brian Doyle 1 130 21-02-2025, 05:59 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Schnapf Threatens Credibility Of JFK Research Brian Doyle 1 144 27-01-2025, 07:13 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Roger Odisio Plants Credibility Time Bomb At Heart Of CT Research Brian Doyle 8 2,001 07-06-2024, 06:18 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim Hargrove Chooses Politics Over Good Research Brian Doyle 0 498 12-01-2024, 10:17 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The JFK Research Community Is Responsible For This Brian Doyle 0 557 28-11-2023, 04:48 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  How The Education Forum Destroyed Credible JFK Research Brian Doyle 8 1,974 09-07-2023, 09:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 864 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  EXCELLENT Research on LHO & Ruth Hyde Paine [and family] - Linda Minor Peter Lemkin 15 41,135 29-07-2019, 08:06 PM
Last Post: Tom Scully
  JFK Research Methodology James Lateer 19 29,360 02-07-2018, 04:00 PM
Last Post: James Lateer
  Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! Richard Gilbride 15 13,492 01-02-2017, 12:18 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)