30-09-2015, 10:31 PM
David Healy Wrote:you gotta be kidding me? The frame image is crap, PERIOD! Lets see a histogram of the original frame. Then how many generations from the in-camera original frame is the frame you are currently studying? Tell us how long the in-camera original frame PM/PW arm is in pixels. Geez, and yet, within this degraded image you see clarity, a notch in the forearm at most 2-3 pixels in width...
Lets see, internet/forum-board imagery jpeg/gif regardless of image size, is 72dpi), then there's the compression issues and artifacts... We'll start there, the dimension of the image you're currently reviewing? And how many generations from the original frame? Feel free to have Dunc give you a hand (if he's not to busy starting another forum...
No, I disagree. Actually the photo Duncan presented was adequate enough that Drew actually caught some very fine features that I missed.
Mr Healy, I'm not a photo expert but I would gamble that your "histogram" would make no difference according to what is being shown. I would also point out that you are offering nothing different than what you did last time and are trying to obfuscate with photo tech talk instead of answering what was already clearly visible enough in the photo in question.
The notch is there and is visible. Enough that Drew clearly confirmed it. You still haven't answered it short of excuses.