01-10-2015, 05:33 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Your statement above is incorrect. The features I'm taking about would be in the original just the same as they are in Duncan's image. Actually, despite your protests, Duncan used valid photographic techniques to bring out the features he was outlining. I have yet to see you give a technical reason why that contrast-shifting technique wasn't valid. However the things we are talking about would be visible in one unaltered frame just as well. The contrast shifting just allowed more emphasis.You are asserting several things without supporting proof. The features are there in the original? PROVE IT.
Good luck with that. And I know in advance that you won't even try.