Sean Murphy's research deserves more

[Albert Doyle]

That is without a doubt one of the worst cases of junk science I've ever seen... The size of the entire frame is unbelievably small with this portion of that frame even smaller.
There is no way that a tiny crushed out shiny spot can be equated to a specific item like the corner of a pair of glasses without wildly speculating.

David can't answer what the bright spot is. He obviously sees it so none of the Healy trolling or complaints about pixels or blurriness stand.


Wild speculation? What else could it reasonably be in that spot besides an eyeglass frame?

At best those little spots are artifacts and the limitations of the resolution possible. This person is not wearing glasses.

Says David. Meanwhile we have an eyeglass frame right where it should be. Not to mention long hair.

I once suggested this person was wearing a watch on the right wrist - due to that slight white spot right there - but there is no way to substantiate that guess...

I don't see a watch there. I think you would have a much more definite indication if there was.



(That Foster's can is hysterical!)