16-10-2015, 04:26 PM
David Josephs Wrote:And the "reason" you remain wrong is that you dismiss the reality related to photographic limitation and pixelization.
We DO explain these anomolies Albert... they are a result of photoshop manipulation with light curves, brightness and contrast as well as a number of other tools you obviously remain oblivious about and can't seem to use google to learn something.
-snip-
So please Albert... give it up.
No David, repeating the pixelation canard isn't going to get you out of answering my technical argument, nice try but no.
You're not answering the point and the overly-general stuff you're bluffing with doesn't cut it.
Directly answer how pixel freaks could line up in perfect conformity like the buttons MacRae has shown? You're threatening your own credibility by giving an answer like that.
How did tricks and quirks of photo enlargement end up making buttons in perfect order right where they should be? You don't answer a lot of what I write. For instance you ignored my pointing out that even your own photo showed the buttons.
It's rich, David, that you call me oblivious when it is obviously you who is beneath the argument here and can't answer it.
Quote:The reason you're wrong, David, is because the buttons are in uniform order where they should be on the coat. If they were the product of pixel irregularities they would be random. The odds of them randomly appearing in the correct uniform order of buttons exactly where they should be is astronomical and you haven't answered the better argument here. Those buttons are there and they appear where buttons should be, and you haven't given an adequate explanation for it.