Proof the fatal shot came from somewhere else other then the rear

[Scott Kaiser]

Okay, so there is factual incompetence on the part of splicing of the film, why in Gods name would someone want to splice the film in the first place makes no sense, and because someone makes the accusation of the film being stretched horizontally, people will generally believe what they're told. I seem to have a problem with that because Veronica who is a leading expert at Matson Film does not believe the film is stretched, but does believe the film is spliced. However, there is no splicing or foul play at the most crucial part of the entire film, and that is at the moment of the fatal shot, meaning there are no alterations of the film between z313 and z317. If there is one frame missing, or one frame stretched, or one frame altered that has absolutely no adverse effect to the most crucial part of the frame, do you consider the entire film to be unreliable? I wonder if there are any real experts here in how 8mm film and super 8 works?

::headbang::