21-10-2015, 09:58 PM
Quote:However, there is no splicing or foul play at the most crucial part of the entire film, and that is at the moment of the fatal shot, meaning there are no alterations of the film between z313 and z317. If there is one frame missing, or one frame stretched, or one frame altered that has absolutely no adverse effect to the most crucial part of the frame, do you consider the entire film to be unreliable? I wonder if there are any real experts here in how 8mm film and super 8 works?
The absoluteness inwhich you make your declarations of non-alteration just screams "I don't know what the @# I'm talking about"
Scott... you have no idea what was or wasn't done between 12:30 11/22 and Monday morning the 25th...
What I do know is that tracing these films is nowhere as easy as you would expect it to be. There are many more than a few frames missing between 300 and 345...
One last point Scott... the FBI and SS placed the final shot 40 feet further down Elm than the Zfilm shows it. And the first shot a good 50 feet farther up Elm than the Zfilm shows.
CE884 is the SS version of a shot 40 feet further down Elm. From what information would the FBI have concluded the final shot was where Leo Gauthier put it here on this model, at the foot of the stairs
And how can 2 shots be fired between the FBI's shot 2 & 3 unless the limo was barely moving.... the Zfilm does not show a sub 3mph speed as it needed to be for that and Hill to have reached the limo in the 3 steps he takes...
You'll need to do better than just saying so Scott... I can prove over and over the inauthenticity of that film...
Can you prove it authentic?
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter