Proof the fatal shot came from somewhere else other then the rear

[Brian Castle]

I thought it worth my time to attempt to persuade Brian not to engage in a
double standard I cannot avoid regarding as hypocritical. I try to keep on myself a burden of proof I demand of the DPD, FBI, CIA, and the WC. I cannot fathom what burden of proof you constrain yourself to. You assume a lot, as far as what is or is not compelling evidence supporting your own conclusions, or am I mistaking "style" for conclusions. If you conclude, instead of embracing a strong suspicion that the Z-film has been altered, or the BYP, for that matter, I have to part ways with you if I am to maintain a standard of proof I do hold the government agencies I mentioned above, to.

Hi Tom, you're referring to a double standard, so can you articulate specifically what both parts are?

There's only two kinds of evidence, physical evidence and witness statements. The witness statements made under oath (in this case) are probably no more reliable than any other witnesses statements, whether they were made at the time or much later.

What specifically is the double standard?