17-02-2016, 11:29 PM
Final thought today on this Neely Street business. I'm simply intrigued by all of this, and have been since coming across that odd pay stub in the wrongfully accused's possession per the DPD property-sheet. Why would a pay stub of a total stranger be in anyone's personal effects? Especially one that's rather dated (some 39 months hence of it's issuance) "found" on someone living on another continent altogether during the pay period in question. Strange I tell you.
Further reading today about James Arthur Jackson and the Neely Street residence in general brought me to an exchange between top shelf researchers Mr. Parker (Greg) and Mr. Scully (Tom), where both are seriously questioning whether or not the wrongfully accused even resided on Neely Street, with Mr. Parker citing credible evidence to the contrary, and Mr. Scully sharing the following insightful link as well ---->
http://neelyst.blogspot.com/
Amazing to what great lengths these lying treasonous cowards would go to finger an innocent party w/contrived evidence. $#%@ clowns!
Further reading today about James Arthur Jackson and the Neely Street residence in general brought me to an exchange between top shelf researchers Mr. Parker (Greg) and Mr. Scully (Tom), where both are seriously questioning whether or not the wrongfully accused even resided on Neely Street, with Mr. Parker citing credible evidence to the contrary, and Mr. Scully sharing the following insightful link as well ---->
http://neelyst.blogspot.com/
Amazing to what great lengths these lying treasonous cowards would go to finger an innocent party w/contrived evidence. $#%@ clowns!