16-09-2009, 01:48 AM
It is a waste of time to argue against Darwinism
on the internet. Too many people have had it
indoctrinated into them as "science" for generations
that it goes against their faith. It has been to the
benefit of "someone" to present it as a SCIENCE
VS. RELIGION controversy...when it is has nothing
to do with religion and little to do with science.
Darwinism is actually anti-scientific, in that it does
not use the "scientific method" nor provide for
proof by replication. It ignores the scientific principle
of CAUSE AND EFFECT. No Darwinist has ever provided
proof that all existing life forms were created by
mutation from a single living life form which arose
spontaneously from inert non-living elements. But
those generalities aside, there are thousands of
arguments against Darwinism for its anti-intellectualism.
A far deeper philosophical subject, which Religionists
seek to answer and Darwinists ignore, is WHAT IS THE
NATURE OF LIFE. Religious philosophers mostly agree
that a mysterious unknowable SPIRIT is the basis of
life; most scientists deny the existence of a SPIRT
since science has no means of observing it. But I
observe that at death, a spirit that provided life and
being is no longer present...so the ABSENCE of the
spirit proves its existence.
Jack
on the internet. Too many people have had it
indoctrinated into them as "science" for generations
that it goes against their faith. It has been to the
benefit of "someone" to present it as a SCIENCE
VS. RELIGION controversy...when it is has nothing
to do with religion and little to do with science.
Darwinism is actually anti-scientific, in that it does
not use the "scientific method" nor provide for
proof by replication. It ignores the scientific principle
of CAUSE AND EFFECT. No Darwinist has ever provided
proof that all existing life forms were created by
mutation from a single living life form which arose
spontaneously from inert non-living elements. But
those generalities aside, there are thousands of
arguments against Darwinism for its anti-intellectualism.
A far deeper philosophical subject, which Religionists
seek to answer and Darwinists ignore, is WHAT IS THE
NATURE OF LIFE. Religious philosophers mostly agree
that a mysterious unknowable SPIRIT is the basis of
life; most scientists deny the existence of a SPIRT
since science has no means of observing it. But I
observe that at death, a spirit that provided life and
being is no longer present...so the ABSENCE of the
spirit proves its existence.
Jack