14-05-2016, 04:57 AM
I always love the line [true by the way] that 15 of the 19 'hijackers' [not true by the way - patsy hijackers would be more to the truth] were Saudi. Then, the question SHOULD be why did the USA not immediately attack S.A. instead of the pre-planed Iraq and Afghanistan? While the 28 pages no doubt make S.A. look bad, as they should, it really leads ultimately to US foreknowledge and complicity - before/during/after and THAT is more damning by light-years than that S.A. [and Pakistan and Israel and others] played minor parts in the affair of 9-11, which was ONLY to give an excuse for the endless 'war on terror', and thus control over the civilian populations and endless war.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass