11-09-2016, 09:48 AM
The following couple of para's also caught my eye:
This raises the question, again, about the story carried by the French newspaper Le Figaro in July 2001, that a CIA officer met with bin Laden in an American hospital in Dubai where he weas being treated for kidney failure. The CIA denied this meeting had taken place - and the Le Figaro report has now long been pulled.
However, the news agency UPI, again reported on this story on 31st October 2001 (HERE).
One telling point from this death mythology story is the para that tells us that president Musharraf personally approved bin Laden's treatment for "renal problems" at a military hospital near Peshawar.
We can therefore fairly safely conclude that bin Laden was, indeed, suffering from serious kidney problems, as reported by Le Figaro, and that he received treatment for this condition during his later safe stay in Pakistan.
The only two remaining problems, therefore, appear to be exactly when? Did he transfer to Pakistan in 2001 or 2003? Did the denied meeting with a CIA official involve making arrangements for his transfer to Pakistan for sake-kkeping/hiding where despite hospital treatment in Peshawar, he almost immediately died anyway (HERE and HERE). These two media reports are simply two of very many at that time that carried the story of his death.
Or perhaps this was one of those faked deaths of convenience - something that happens to high worth intelligence assets who are required to disappear from sight?
If the latter was the case, it suggests to me that someone in the US intelligence community (at least) aided - or at knew about bin Laden's transfer to Pakistan and quite possibly had the French again float the story of his death in December 2001 that was then picked up by numerous news outlets.
Quote:Al-Libi is described by the document as manager of al-Qaeda operations in Iraq, as well as a "senior commander of operations in Pakistan who maintained communication with senior al-Qaeda leadership including UBM [Osama bin Laden]."
Detained by Pakistani security forces and passed to the CIA in May 2005, the document recorded that he had "provided safe havens for UBL and senior al-Qaeda leader Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri in 2001 and 2003."
The document goes on to say that in July 2003  the year that al-Libi provided a safe haven for Osama bin Laden:
This raises the question, again, about the story carried by the French newspaper Le Figaro in July 2001, that a CIA officer met with bin Laden in an American hospital in Dubai where he weas being treated for kidney failure. The CIA denied this meeting had taken place - and the Le Figaro report has now long been pulled.
However, the news agency UPI, again reported on this story on 31st October 2001 (HERE).
One telling point from this death mythology story is the para that tells us that president Musharraf personally approved bin Laden's treatment for "renal problems" at a military hospital near Peshawar.
We can therefore fairly safely conclude that bin Laden was, indeed, suffering from serious kidney problems, as reported by Le Figaro, and that he received treatment for this condition during his later safe stay in Pakistan.
The only two remaining problems, therefore, appear to be exactly when? Did he transfer to Pakistan in 2001 or 2003? Did the denied meeting with a CIA official involve making arrangements for his transfer to Pakistan for sake-kkeping/hiding where despite hospital treatment in Peshawar, he almost immediately died anyway (HERE and HERE). These two media reports are simply two of very many at that time that carried the story of his death.
Or perhaps this was one of those faked deaths of convenience - something that happens to high worth intelligence assets who are required to disappear from sight?
If the latter was the case, it suggests to me that someone in the US intelligence community (at least) aided - or at knew about bin Laden's transfer to Pakistan and quite possibly had the French again float the story of his death in December 2001 that was then picked up by numerous news outlets.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14