13-09-2016, 09:56 PM
While I think the existence of the insider trading deals are an important clue, I doubt that the insider trades were "authorized" by anyone who "officially" had advance notice. Since the trades themselves were for (merely) millions in profits, it seems unlikely that any organization, or group of conspirators, would risk what would inevitably be nearly fatal exposure, for so puny a return.
I'm guessing that whoever placed these puts and calls did so without the knowledge or approval of any others "in the know". And, they probably have since disappeared or died. So, if we were hunting for a suspect, I'd look for someone-highly-placed 's friend or relative who died shortly after coming into some quick cash.
I'm guessing that whoever placed these puts and calls did so without the knowledge or approval of any others "in the know". And, they probably have since disappeared or died. So, if we were hunting for a suspect, I'd look for someone-highly-placed 's friend or relative who died shortly after coming into some quick cash.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."