12-02-2017, 06:41 PM
In a nutshell, I take every assassin that was ever connected to my father and report on them both, tying the story together. I've read books which have blamed just one entity or the other, books that have blamed several entities, and books that focused on a single person as the shooter with some backup team or another.
What I'm doing is taking every assassin that's ever worked with my dad whose main focus was to assassinate Castro, and these plots that continued even after Kennedy was assassinated. There seems to be that one policy that continues to surface and re-surface more than any other policy with the United States, and that was America's foreign policy with Cuba.
When we can connect the dots, and take a good hard look at every assassin rather then to blame a single entity or the collective heads of these departments as to who we think did it, then this picture becomes clear.
That's my goal, however, I fully respect everyone's opinions and theories, I suppose, I'm unorthodox, and that could be a bad thing, who knows?
Thus, is the reason I felt the book itself should appropriately be called, ASSASSINS.
What I'm doing is taking every assassin that's ever worked with my dad whose main focus was to assassinate Castro, and these plots that continued even after Kennedy was assassinated. There seems to be that one policy that continues to surface and re-surface more than any other policy with the United States, and that was America's foreign policy with Cuba.
When we can connect the dots, and take a good hard look at every assassin rather then to blame a single entity or the collective heads of these departments as to who we think did it, then this picture becomes clear.
That's my goal, however, I fully respect everyone's opinions and theories, I suppose, I'm unorthodox, and that could be a bad thing, who knows?
Thus, is the reason I felt the book itself should appropriately be called, ASSASSINS.