Thank you Peter, for your kind words, your insight into the publishing arena of which I'm sure you are all to familiar with. I am working with Ricci Moore, CEO of Spectrum Film Group who I have signed a contract with to make the book into film. Mr. Moore is also my acting agent once the book becomes published, he, along with the publisher is responsible for the books publicity. The publisher I am working with is Skyhorse Publishing. Joe, who I've talked to on the phone a number of times is as excited as Ricci and I to see this to print, this is a "non-fiction" book biography and documentary all rolled up into one.
In my heart, I do this for my father, who was never like the so many men, agents, double agents and assassins during those days seeking to be an opportunist. Perhaps, the best stories are told from the heart of those living survivors willing to share. I am no opportunist or bully trying to force my way into this political atmosphere, all I'm trying to do is justly tell a story that's never been heard of.
Saying this, it is hard to separate truth from fiction thus is the reason I rely on FOIA documentation to help me piece together one man and his cohorts journey through life. No doubt my father's phone book pages alone tells a story as most of these men found within the pages have been implicated in the assassination by researchers.
I try my very best not to get lost in these stories bringing what I can to light no matter how boring the truth may be. I have never, ever indicated that my father had anything to do with Kennedy's assassination, but I have also stipulated that on that day, my father was nowhere to be found until he arrived home in Norwalk at midnight.
I'm sorry if I have ever offended anyone or made them feel uncomfortable whenever I posted any information, please note this has never, ever been about me, it has always been about my father. If more children can love their parents with the love I have shown towards my mother and my father in the few short years I got to know him, I believe this world would be a better place. I'm reminded of a speech Kevin Durant once said when he accepted his MVP award, he looked at his mother who was sitting in the crowd of spectators just outside his reach, pointed his finger at her and said, that's the real MVP right there.
There is something I'd like to share with everyone, but particularly to those who doubted my story, something I had to think about before I pursued the story. We know without a doubt my father had photographs, determining what these photographs represented was the core to the story, well, they had nothing to do with Watergate because my father was called to testify behind closed door sessions with Howard S. Liebengood in 1973-74., and as much information my father gave to Liebengood he, my father at anytime could have showed Liebengood these photos, after all, my father had turned on Frank regarding the VVAW thing right?
The CIA receives this information from Richard Poyle, of all people who is reporting on my father regarding the photos. And, this information goes directly to Director of Operations at the CIA who was JJA who sends this information directly to Director of the FBI who was Hoover.
Was the information from Poyle that important on my father? When I dig even ever more deeper, I discover what these photos represented, and why they were never introduced into the Watergate investigation, because they were going to get subpoenaed by Dallas who was investigating my father. Truth is, the photos along with my father were to testify at the HSCA on January 20, 1978, however, that never happened.
The rest is history, so I can fully understand how one could be so skeptical in the material I have uncovered, but this is the truth. I know that if my father never exposed those photos during the Watergate Hearings, and Watergate had nothing to do with the HSCA, and he was scheduled to testify at the HSCA (House Select Committee on ASSASSINATIONS,) then you can bet the story I got from Rudy is the truth.
My next question for anyone who wishes to answer would be. Could this eveidence be the eveidence that could get us even closer to what really happened. Mr. Best is right about one thing, and that is this information belongs to the people.
Getting information out of the kind you have Scott is not easy. Not easy as no book is easy to market and get out - and then you likely have hidden forces that would like to see it never see the light of day. I'm not an expert on this and to be honest am doing my own hunting for how to get out my own book on a totally different subject now. I'd suggest you contact several persons who have successfully gotten out book that fall into the general topic of 'national security secrets', and ask them how they found their editors, publishers, etc....and all of the horror stories [which they all have]...and plan from there. Ditto about documentary filmmakers. An interested investor is always a great asset, but they are few and far between...less so those that won't interfere in your desired directions of approach. A good editor can turn something that is disorganized and complex into a interesting, exciting and important book. Publishers don't like many photos nor documents due to cost and the documents as they fear it will turn off the average reader. They'll allow some, but not as many as you want. The book need not, and likely can not be, the 'final word' on the subject. However, getting it 'out there' will get others who know other pieces of the puzzle to come forward for a revised edition or follow up book with a more definitive story. Getting on alternative media talk shows is another way to beat the bushes for missing information. There is no one correct way to go forward with something like this, but I'd suggest a multi-pronged approach. It is a hard slog...but in the end necessary and beneficial. I'd also suggest talking to as many former intelligence operatives and officers who have left in disgust and are now whistleblowers - even if their experiences don't overlap with your material. They usually can point you in directions and introduce you to people who can help.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Getting information out of the kind you have Scott is not easy. Not easy as no book is easy to market and get out - and then you likely have hidden forces that would like to see it never see the light of day. I'm not an expert on this and to be honest am doing my own hunting for how to get out my own book on a totally different subject now. I'd suggest you contact several persons who have successfully gotten out book that fall into the general topic of 'national security secrets', and ask them how they found their editors, publishers, etc....and all of the horror stories [which they all have]...and plan from there. Ditto about documentary filmmakers. An interested investor is always a great asset, but they are few and far between...less so those that won't interfere in your desired directions of approach. A good editor can turn something that is disorganized and complex into a interesting, exciting and important book. Publishers don't like many photos nor documents due to cost and the documents as they fear it will turn off the average reader. They'll allow some, but not as many as you want. The book need not, and likely can not be, the 'final word' on the subject. However, getting it 'out there' will get others who know other pieces of the puzzle to come forward for a revised edition or follow up book with a more definitive story. Getting on alternative media talk shows is another way to beat the bushes for missing information. There is no one correct way to go forward with something like this, but I'd suggest a multi-pronged approach. It is a hard slog...but in the end necessary and beneficial. I'd also suggest talking to as many former intelligence operatives and officers who have left in disgust and are now whistleblowers - even if their experiences don't overlap with your material. They usually can point you in directions and introduce you to people who can help.
Thanks for the advise, in the beginning, I was beating the walls, talking to anyone who would listen, now, I just take one day at a time, you are correct that there is hidden forces that would like no better then for any true discovery to never come to light. Then, there are those who will criticize, ridicule, and those skeptics who are doubters. It all comes with the territory. I've learned that if I can't discredit those who have shared their stories with me, then there has got to be some truth to them.
There seems to be more circumstantial evidence then there is coincidences, if everything was one big coincidence, then, that would be pretty easy to explain away, unfortunately, it's not.
In a nutshell, I take every assassin that was ever connected to my father and report on them both, tying the story together. I've read books which have blamed just one entity or the other, books that have blamed several entities, and books that focused on a single person as the shooter with some backup team or another.
What I'm doing is taking every assassin that's ever worked with my dad whose main focus was to assassinate Castro, and these plots that continued even after Kennedy was assassinated. There seems to be that one policy that continues to surface and re-surface more than any other policy with the United States, and that was America's foreign policy with Cuba.
When we can connect the dots, and take a good hard look at every assassin rather then to blame a single entity or the collective heads of these departments as to who we think did it, then this picture becomes clear.
That's my goal, however, I fully respect everyone's opinions and theories, I suppose, I'm unorthodox, and that could be a bad thing, who knows?
Thus, is the reason I felt the book itself should appropriately be called, ASSASSINS.
12-02-2017, 07:44 PM (This post was last modified: 12-02-2017, 08:17 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
Peter, I value your opinion, as I do others, please help me to keep a level head, my question to you, and anyone who wishes to answer is this; is there any other Frenchie that Howard Hunt knew? I know that during Watergate, Hunt was the silent boss who placed Kaiser in-change of the "Sunward Plan while others were doing other things in Watergate."
Is this just another coincidence that Edwin Kaiser was aka Frenchie? And, Hunt never made any identification as to who this Frenchie is/was, but he merely states this Frenchie does exist?
Oh, and I forgot to mention, this investigation was going on and after a report came in from St. Louis 1972 Kaiser left for Alaska in October 1972, he returned to Miami on October 18, 1972 from Alaska, just another coincidence right?
I guess a better question would be, with all this evidence piling up against my father, why would he never spend a single day in prison? Anyone else would have spent years behind bars for what my father's done, but not him.... Why?
If no one can answer that, I can't figure it out either.
12-02-2017, 10:02 PM (This post was last modified: 13-02-2017, 05:28 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
"The reason I called you, Hunt to Colson, was to make, un--get back to the beginning here--(meaning, Bay of Pigs,) is because of the commitments, uh, that were made to all of us at onset, have not been kept." Speaking about the promises/commitments made by Jack Kennedy.
All of them? wait a minute, you mean to tell me that all of them, but one was involved with Cuba and her problems, the Bay of Pigs, as the sixth Watergater writes?
Promise for air support, promise to free Cuba, promise to have the brigade's 2506 flag fly freely over Havana, promise to allow the CIA to carry on their infiltration's into Cuba, but Nixon shut it down.
Hunt talks about the great deal of money that's not been covered, "and what we've been getting has been coming in, un, [very minor dribs and drabs.]
Well, and while we get third and fourth hand reassurances, still, the ready is not available.
And, that's a basic problem.
The apparent, uh, unconcern, on some hesitancy prior to the election. Of course we're aware of the upcoming problems of the Senate.
Colson - But the Democrats made such an issue out of it.
Hunt - On the other hand they kept it from themselves, the real issue.
Divert the Democrats from the real issue?
Now, I could transcribe a lot more here to pinpoint what Watergate was truly about, but I think I'll stop here, and allow the reader to listen for themselves, to undertake their own opinion of what they believe Hunt and Colson are speaking about, what I understand their conversation to be is the fact that Hunt and company had concerns on the hesitancy prior to the elections, which was to invade Cuba. The Bay of Pigs had haunted Hunt which he, along with others involved needed the funds to infiltrate Cuba, and Sturgis had always wanted to recapture Cuba since 1961.
You don't have to take my word for it, Hunt's entire conversation was regarding promises made that were broken, Cuba's freedom.
