Shelley and Lovelady? Are You Sure??

[Albert Doyle]

I wonder what Bob Prudhomme's opinion would be on Excellence In Research Bart Kamp trying to get away with saying the men Campbell saw going in to the Depository were not Baker and Truly? Molina's timing shows Truly went in 20-30 seconds after the shots. So any officer who went in with him would have gone in at the same time. The films all show the only cop that could be is Baker. Kamp is trying to get away with the desperate suggestion that somehow because Campbell didn't specifically say "Baker" that this isn't evidence. This is the dishonest and flimsy house of cards that the Murphy theory that has taken over the community is based on. Holding people to disingenuous semantics over the obvious. Meanwhile for more credible analyzers this locks the Piper/West witnessing into place and confirms Baker and Truly entered immediately, as shown in the films and spoken of in testimony. DiEugenio is normally very critical of dishonest arguments like Kamp's but stays quiet while Kamp tries to get away with evidence murder like he does here. A clear intent of spinning the evidence becomes the norm and good researchers are seen saying things like "Kamp has done a good job in showing the second floor lunchroom encounter never happened". So an obvious clown who has had his bogus offerings rejected soundly is allowed to refer to "Doyle" as a derisive slight, as if referring to Fetzer or Cinque, even though Doyle has handed him his ass and almost single-handedly refuted Murphy with none of the 'honorable' membership of the forum saying anything.


Time to establish that the reasonable evidence shows Baker and Truly went in to the Depository as told and Shelley and Lovelady are the two men seen walking down the Elm St Extension. At this point prolonging of these subjects is due to Murphy backers ignoring reasonable proof.




.