Baker denies identifying the wrongfully accused ---->
BELIN: We have a statement from Marvin Johnson, the officer who took your affidavit. Officer Johnson said in that statement, and I quote: "Officer Baker later identified Lee Harvey Oswald as the
man he had seen on the fourth floor of the Texas School Book Depository." Is that true, Officer
Baker? Did you identify Oswald as the man you had seen?
BAKER: No,sir. Whilst it is true that Oswald was present at the time I made that affidavit with Officer Johnson, I described the person I had encountered as I remembered him - that was -- he was a
white man, approximately 30 years old, 5'9", weighed about 165, had darkhair, and was wearing a light brown jacket. If that person had been Oswald, I would have recognized Oswald and made sure I included
that identification of the suspect in my affidavit.
At this point Baker doesn't even recognize the wrongfully accused. Why? Because no one at this point has impressed upon him he needed to help craft a phantom 2nd floor encounter with someone he didn't even recognize at this juncture. That came later, thus the four different versions of a single event. Who needs four tries to share the plain simple truth about a single event?
BELIN: We have a statement from Marvin Johnson, the officer who took your affidavit. Officer Johnson said in that statement, and I quote: "Officer Baker later identified Lee Harvey Oswald as the
man he had seen on the fourth floor of the Texas School Book Depository." Is that true, Officer
Baker? Did you identify Oswald as the man you had seen?
BAKER: No,sir. Whilst it is true that Oswald was present at the time I made that affidavit with Officer Johnson, I described the person I had encountered as I remembered him - that was -- he was a
white man, approximately 30 years old, 5'9", weighed about 165, had darkhair, and was wearing a light brown jacket. If that person had been Oswald, I would have recognized Oswald and made sure I included
that identification of the suspect in my affidavit.
At this point Baker doesn't even recognize the wrongfully accused. Why? Because no one at this point has impressed upon him he needed to help craft a phantom 2nd floor encounter with someone he didn't even recognize at this juncture. That came later, thus the four different versions of a single event. Who needs four tries to share the plain simple truth about a single event?