02-12-2017, 02:31 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-12-2017, 03:09 AM by Cliff Varnell.)
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Blah, blah blah Cliff.
You have been saying the same thing about this case for years, probably decades. Even people on our side disagree with you, like Pat Speer.
Pat can't defend his T3 denial.
I got David Von Pein to agree with me. Unlike you, I didn't engage in fake debates year after year with him.
He claimed JFK's clothing was jacked up 2 inches in the Croft photo.
I pointed out that a normal amount of JFK's shirt collar is visible in that photo, the jacket collar was at the base of his neck -- how could multiple inches of shirt and jacket be jacked up entirely above the top of the back without pushing up at the jacket collar at the base of the neck.
Von Pein conceded the point instantly -- the Croft photo on Elm St. shows no significant bunch up of the clothing.
He wanted to go on about the autopsy photos but I dismissed him -- "No further questions."
Quote:In a court of law, which is what Simpich, Tanenbaum and Schnapf were in, you would have to prove the falsity of the autopsy photos, not simply alteration.
Not without a chain of possession. There is no chain of possession and the photos were not prepared according to proper autopsy protocol.
Quote: That would take time, in fact you would probably have to call for an evidentiary hearing which would take days to prepare for and probably a day to try.
Burden of proof is on the state that that's JFK in those photos.
Doesn't help them anyway!
Quote:Now, you also agree with Chris Davidson that the Z film is altered, as you said over on EF. So your case would now entail two evidentiary hearings. (I think they are called 402 hearings in California.)
I agree that the Zapruder film proves conspiracy no matter whether it was altered or not.
Thank you Chris for citing something other than microanalyses of inferior evidence.
Quote:The hearing on the Z film, in my opinion, would take over a week.
I'd argue for the authenticity of Z186 to Z255.
Quote:So at your mock trial, that would last about three weeks: go for it buddy. Maybe you can raise the money by some of those films you have on You Tube.
No, my mock trial is based on the FBI report on the autopsy.
You say prosecutors can challenge it -- bring it!
The State of Texas claimed JFK was shot in the back of the neck...You think that's defensible?