04-12-2017, 10:21 PM
By the way, let me add, one of the things that is so interesting about Mike Chesser's work is that brings up an aspect of the questions about the brain validity that I did not recall.
Boswell said that the flax, a tight drum surface attachment that keeps the brain in place was terribly damaged for a long length on the top of the skull, an area which shows extensive fracturing and disruption in the bone above it.
He then adds that from his experience, which is over 30 years as a neurologist, this strikes him as being so far out that he cannot imagine that kind of disruption above, yet for the delicate tissues of the brain to have remained intact.
This whole brain issue is now becoming more and more salient as being one of the most phony parts of the official story. Its a real shame, that like many things in this case, it has taken so long for our side to get to it. The first time I recall it being broached was by Horne in the nineties.
In other words, it took over three decades to address.
Boswell said that the flax, a tight drum surface attachment that keeps the brain in place was terribly damaged for a long length on the top of the skull, an area which shows extensive fracturing and disruption in the bone above it.
He then adds that from his experience, which is over 30 years as a neurologist, this strikes him as being so far out that he cannot imagine that kind of disruption above, yet for the delicate tissues of the brain to have remained intact.
This whole brain issue is now becoming more and more salient as being one of the most phony parts of the official story. Its a real shame, that like many things in this case, it has taken so long for our side to get to it. The first time I recall it being broached was by Horne in the nineties.
In other words, it took over three decades to address.