19-02-2018, 06:31 PM
When looking through the newly posted lists of recently published JFK books, I just don't see why it is very difficult for an experienced JFK (or Deep State) researcher to spot the ones that are worthwhile.
There seems to me to be only two criteria in which any experienced reader should be interested:
(1) Does the author claim to have any information which is new and about which there is little or no currently available information?
(2) Does the author claim to have identified exactly who planned and/or backed the assassination and which is a theory that has not already been discredited?
The only book which is on the drawing boards which meets the above criteria is the book by H P Albarelli about QJ WIN and Otto Skorzeny. Another one could be "The Men Who Don't Fit In" by Richard Hooke.
Even some books which look to be very impressive, like the recent book by Flip De Mey, "The Lee Harvey Oswald Files" (which I purchased and perused) doesn't seem to have any new information or analysis.
Other than the search for the perpetrators and the search for new and probative evidence, how can one justify buying and reading any new JFK books?
Ostensibly, the reason many people would eagerly support the release of all the remaining JFK classified files is so that we can finally learn who murdered JFK. There are apparently very few authors who understand what is involved it this. Peter Dale Scott, Joan Mellen, Dr. Jeffrey Caufield and Dick Russell are basically the entire list. Some would include Judyth Vary Baker who has also recently published, but many think her work is a scam. I now own her most recent book "The Big Picture" and have perused it and will read it. At least it seems like a genuine effort.
Ironically, the only book published which hits the mark regarding the assassination is "Treason For My Daily Bread" by Lebedev. This book is fictionalized and on the internet it is usually described as a hoax and a scam. BUT (FICTIONALIZED OR NOT), IT HITS THE MARK! It's the only book (excepting one) that identifies ex-Nazis partnering with segregationists.
Since the upcoming Hank Albarelli book blames Otto Skorzeny, that makes it authentic. There is very little doubt that the worldwide network of ex-Nazis like Skorzeny were mainly responsible, in cooperation with persons in the West German government and a few Southern segregationist fellow travelers like James O Eastland and Leander Perez.
Sadly, many apparently believe in "the democracy of JFK authors." That is, they are all considered as equals, whether they solve the crime or they focus on Oswald's belly-button. Maybe there will be some who read this and who take the time necessary to read and get the word out on the real perpetrators of the JFK assassination.
The best place to hide information is (sadly) in a library.
James Lateer
There seems to me to be only two criteria in which any experienced reader should be interested:
(1) Does the author claim to have any information which is new and about which there is little or no currently available information?
(2) Does the author claim to have identified exactly who planned and/or backed the assassination and which is a theory that has not already been discredited?
The only book which is on the drawing boards which meets the above criteria is the book by H P Albarelli about QJ WIN and Otto Skorzeny. Another one could be "The Men Who Don't Fit In" by Richard Hooke.
Even some books which look to be very impressive, like the recent book by Flip De Mey, "The Lee Harvey Oswald Files" (which I purchased and perused) doesn't seem to have any new information or analysis.
Other than the search for the perpetrators and the search for new and probative evidence, how can one justify buying and reading any new JFK books?
Ostensibly, the reason many people would eagerly support the release of all the remaining JFK classified files is so that we can finally learn who murdered JFK. There are apparently very few authors who understand what is involved it this. Peter Dale Scott, Joan Mellen, Dr. Jeffrey Caufield and Dick Russell are basically the entire list. Some would include Judyth Vary Baker who has also recently published, but many think her work is a scam. I now own her most recent book "The Big Picture" and have perused it and will read it. At least it seems like a genuine effort.
Ironically, the only book published which hits the mark regarding the assassination is "Treason For My Daily Bread" by Lebedev. This book is fictionalized and on the internet it is usually described as a hoax and a scam. BUT (FICTIONALIZED OR NOT), IT HITS THE MARK! It's the only book (excepting one) that identifies ex-Nazis partnering with segregationists.
Since the upcoming Hank Albarelli book blames Otto Skorzeny, that makes it authentic. There is very little doubt that the worldwide network of ex-Nazis like Skorzeny were mainly responsible, in cooperation with persons in the West German government and a few Southern segregationist fellow travelers like James O Eastland and Leander Perez.
Sadly, many apparently believe in "the democracy of JFK authors." That is, they are all considered as equals, whether they solve the crime or they focus on Oswald's belly-button. Maybe there will be some who read this and who take the time necessary to read and get the word out on the real perpetrators of the JFK assassination.
The best place to hide information is (sadly) in a library.
James Lateer