30-03-2018, 12:21 AM
David Josephs Wrote:Quote:But, for the record, I have not seen any interpretation that I agreed with destroyed by AlanFord.
IOW - you still agree with your own opinions of the interpretations....
"destroyed" seems a bit more than needed.... how about an interpretation that makes you think a little more critically ?
nothing offered gives you pause on any single item about which you've come to a conclusion?
wow
::
Before posting. yes. I stand by my conclusions, the SecondFloorLunchRoomEncounter occurred at about 12:31/12:32pm CST, therefor the HoaxTheory is invalid, which all but eliminates any possibility for the LeeHarveyOswaldPrayerManTheory being valid. And, when actual absolute reliable proof is presented, that disproves said conclusions, I will acknowledge said proof and post no more on this forum. But, admittedly, the standard is high. And certainly claiming known, and deceased, eyewitnesses of lying does not qualify as actual absolute reliable proof!
Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch