Courtesy of a Journal of Forensic Sciences article, Characteristics of Backspatter on the Firearm and Shooting HandAn Experimental Analysis of Close-range Gunshots, co-authored by Sebastian N. Kunz MD., Ph.D; Herwig Brandtner M.D.; and, Harald J. Meyer Ph.D…. --Ã
Contact and closeâ€range gunshot injuries can produce bloodstains on the shooting hand and weapon. In this study, backspatter was analyzed in experimental horizontal pistol shots into bloodâ€filled sponges. The shooting distances were set between 0 and 45 cm. With increasing shooting distance,there was a significant decrease in the degree of backspatter. Microspatter could be detected on the weapon and shooting hand up to a shooting distance of40 cm. They were predominantly located on thumb and index finger as well as the radial dorsal aspects of the hand. Fine spray of microspatter combined with elongated droplets in the shape of exclamation marks was found at contact and 2â€cm distance shots. An angular calculation based on the shape of the bloodstains was possible up to a shooting distance of 2 cm. No bloodstainswere detected beyond 45 cm.
Note their experiment was conducted with sponges…the point being here the volume of back spatter upon a human head would produce a MUCH greater impact. Essentially--given the Tippit shot was at point-blank range--the closer to the target that the gun is fired...the great the spatter.
Yet, in spite of this point-blank coup de grace shot directly into the right temple of a human head, officialdom's jacket "evidence" is void of blood spatter. Why? They know why...
Amid their haste to frame an innocent party, the real culprits overlooked more than a few details, and the details they did share run contrary to the tall tale they sold the general public. Nor did the authorities submit into their reports that the gun the wrongly accused is said to have used bore traces of blood back spatter within its barrel, let alone could they record evidence of human blood spatter found upon the wrongly accused's clothing, hands, face, or hair during their staged arrest.
Moreover, Is this frail looking man ---->,weighing in at a scant/mere 131 pounds anywhere near the DPD radio transmission of the actual suspect's weight of 165lbs broadcast out over the air waves at 12:48PM ---->
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=9548&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9548&stc=1)
[size=12]The wrongly accused was framed.
The plain simple truth doesn't require 26 volumes of manure spread. With the above picture in mind, here's an actual description of at least one of the Tippit culprits at the murder scene at 10th & Patton ----> "short, stocky and bushy-haired" -- Helen Markham
Does the wrongly accused--even remotely--appear "stocky"?
Is there anything thick and "bushy" about the wrongly accused's simple hairstyle?
[size=12][size=12]
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]
Contact and closeâ€range gunshot injuries can produce bloodstains on the shooting hand and weapon. In this study, backspatter was analyzed in experimental horizontal pistol shots into bloodâ€filled sponges. The shooting distances were set between 0 and 45 cm. With increasing shooting distance,there was a significant decrease in the degree of backspatter. Microspatter could be detected on the weapon and shooting hand up to a shooting distance of40 cm. They were predominantly located on thumb and index finger as well as the radial dorsal aspects of the hand. Fine spray of microspatter combined with elongated droplets in the shape of exclamation marks was found at contact and 2â€cm distance shots. An angular calculation based on the shape of the bloodstains was possible up to a shooting distance of 2 cm. No bloodstainswere detected beyond 45 cm.
Note their experiment was conducted with sponges…the point being here the volume of back spatter upon a human head would produce a MUCH greater impact. Essentially--given the Tippit shot was at point-blank range--the closer to the target that the gun is fired...the great the spatter.
Yet, in spite of this point-blank coup de grace shot directly into the right temple of a human head, officialdom's jacket "evidence" is void of blood spatter. Why? They know why...
Amid their haste to frame an innocent party, the real culprits overlooked more than a few details, and the details they did share run contrary to the tall tale they sold the general public. Nor did the authorities submit into their reports that the gun the wrongly accused is said to have used bore traces of blood back spatter within its barrel, let alone could they record evidence of human blood spatter found upon the wrongly accused's clothing, hands, face, or hair during their staged arrest.
Moreover, Is this frail looking man ---->,weighing in at a scant/mere 131 pounds anywhere near the DPD radio transmission of the actual suspect's weight of 165lbs broadcast out over the air waves at 12:48PM ---->
[size=12]The wrongly accused was framed.
The plain simple truth doesn't require 26 volumes of manure spread. With the above picture in mind, here's an actual description of at least one of the Tippit culprits at the murder scene at 10th & Patton ----> "short, stocky and bushy-haired" -- Helen Markham
Does the wrongly accused--even remotely--appear "stocky"?
Is there anything thick and "bushy" about the wrongly accused's simple hairstyle?
[size=12][size=12]
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]