The Tippit Case in the New Millenium

[Milo Reech]

Thanks, Mr Lateer, for the compliments, much appreciated.

So this is why I believe that circumstantial evidence is 100 times more useful in solving the JFK case than anything else. And a lot of this is based on deciding on what is probable and what is improbable.


Finally, I believe that I definitely know who plotted the JFK murder and their reasons for doing it. That's why I put together my JFK organizational chart with about 70 persons on it and published it.


I think it's more efficient to identify the general plan and members of the plot and work downward to the details, rather than vice versa.

When reviewing the evidentiary basis, either in descent from a lofty hypothesis or as a preliminary to raising one from the ground up, it hardly matters in one respect -- the devil is in the dirty details, wherein reside gangs of brutal facts poised to murder any number of beautiful theories. The urge to alter or suppress them to fit a hypothesis is the same both ways, up or down, which few can resist even if honest.

Likewise the relative importance of eyewitness versus circumstantial evidence does not matter in this key respect -- both must be given the closest scrutiny in a case replete with evidence manufacture & mutilation.