27-03-2023, 11:20 PM
That is an excellent point, Brian- the correct subjective "reading of the tea leaves" as to what Fritz was intimating in his testimony, and Hosty was hinting at during his interview.
Couple that with the correct objective film forensics- that prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that Oswald is NOT PrayerMan- and you get an argument that is rigorous in extremis against the lunchroom hoax.
I hope that Roger Odisio has a chance to look at this particular thread, and the Sarah Stanton (i.e. PrayerMan) thread, to get some perspective on how inept the scholarship has been that has led to searching the NBC film archives for "PrayerMan".
This has been one of the rotten fruits of a decade of saloon scholarship, whose proponents are brain-damaged narcissists. And yet they have been given a platform by the English "Dr." James Gordon at the Education Forum, who banned me, and mention of my name, and mention of my research (almost entirely about the Depository), and mention of my website jfkinsidejob.com- all for daring to call Sean Murphy what he is- a stupid drunk. That is Gordon's vision of how free speech and inquiry will be tailored when investigating the murder of a American president. Two-fisted drinking Englishmen, Irish and Australians carry the day for voices to be heard for an crime on U.S. soil.
It will have a positive effect, in my opinion, having an NBC archive enhancement brought to light- not only to 100% dispel the PrayerMan nonsense (that has already been done), but to 100% expose the epic stupidity that pervades the JFK research community, which goes right to the top.
The enablers- DiEugenio, Hancock, Gordon- have been just as poisonous as the proponents- Murphy, Parker, Kamp. Maybe the NBC enhancement will be a strong hint that it's time for them all to head out to pasture...
Or will they instead headline the next snoozer of a November-in-Dallas conference?
Couple that with the correct objective film forensics- that prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that Oswald is NOT PrayerMan- and you get an argument that is rigorous in extremis against the lunchroom hoax.
I hope that Roger Odisio has a chance to look at this particular thread, and the Sarah Stanton (i.e. PrayerMan) thread, to get some perspective on how inept the scholarship has been that has led to searching the NBC film archives for "PrayerMan".
This has been one of the rotten fruits of a decade of saloon scholarship, whose proponents are brain-damaged narcissists. And yet they have been given a platform by the English "Dr." James Gordon at the Education Forum, who banned me, and mention of my name, and mention of my research (almost entirely about the Depository), and mention of my website jfkinsidejob.com- all for daring to call Sean Murphy what he is- a stupid drunk. That is Gordon's vision of how free speech and inquiry will be tailored when investigating the murder of a American president. Two-fisted drinking Englishmen, Irish and Australians carry the day for voices to be heard for an crime on U.S. soil.
It will have a positive effect, in my opinion, having an NBC archive enhancement brought to light- not only to 100% dispel the PrayerMan nonsense (that has already been done), but to 100% expose the epic stupidity that pervades the JFK research community, which goes right to the top.
The enablers- DiEugenio, Hancock, Gordon- have been just as poisonous as the proponents- Murphy, Parker, Kamp. Maybe the NBC enhancement will be a strong hint that it's time for them all to head out to pasture...
Or will they instead headline the next snoozer of a November-in-Dallas conference?