23-07-2023, 03:50 PM
Larry Hancock is constitutionally incapable of processing the definitiveness of the height argument that proves PrayerMan is not Lee Harvey Oswald. He has straddled the fence for years on this issue, refusing to take a stand because the consensus of popular opinion wants PrayerMan to be Oswald, irregardless of height and other film forensics. In this respect Hancock functions as an empty-suited yes man, a hack Bolshevik whose main interest is serving the Party, and not the gospel truth.
And he has spoken for 20 years annually at Lancer and carries with him the attendant detritus of prestige. Yet the respect accorded him is not entirely warranted. He doesn't exude the collegiate brilliance of researchers like Josiah Thompson or Barry Ernest. He is not in their league.
Hancock also straddles the fence on the lunchroom issue. Again, he is constitutionally incapable of processing the rigorous arguments which have rebutted this silly hypothesis (which feeds symbiotically off the PrayerMan hypothesis). And in this respect he has failed as a researcher. He is more concerned with pleasing the crowd, and has not shown himself capable of discerning when a debate has been settled ad infinitum. Because of his intellectual ineptitude, and lack of courage, the research community continues to be damaged by a decade-long onslaught of barroom scholarship.
He lives in Oklahoma and has certainly had the opportunity to visit the Sixth Floor Museum and give the research community a detailed description of what additional information can be gleaned from the digitized Darnell film. A typical film scan is at 3200 dpi these days. One would expect that if there was any small feature of that digitized Darnell that even whispered a hint of Oswald, it would be shouted from the rooftops. But what we get instead is crickets. And that keeps the knuckleheaded crowd happy, since they can continue wallowing in their sophistry.
And he has spoken for 20 years annually at Lancer and carries with him the attendant detritus of prestige. Yet the respect accorded him is not entirely warranted. He doesn't exude the collegiate brilliance of researchers like Josiah Thompson or Barry Ernest. He is not in their league.
Hancock also straddles the fence on the lunchroom issue. Again, he is constitutionally incapable of processing the rigorous arguments which have rebutted this silly hypothesis (which feeds symbiotically off the PrayerMan hypothesis). And in this respect he has failed as a researcher. He is more concerned with pleasing the crowd, and has not shown himself capable of discerning when a debate has been settled ad infinitum. Because of his intellectual ineptitude, and lack of courage, the research community continues to be damaged by a decade-long onslaught of barroom scholarship.
He lives in Oklahoma and has certainly had the opportunity to visit the Sixth Floor Museum and give the research community a detailed description of what additional information can be gleaned from the digitized Darnell film. A typical film scan is at 3200 dpi these days. One would expect that if there was any small feature of that digitized Darnell that even whispered a hint of Oswald, it would be shouted from the rooftops. But what we get instead is crickets. And that keeps the knuckleheaded crowd happy, since they can continue wallowing in their sophistry.