04-04-2024, 07:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-04-2024, 05:52 PM by Brian Doyle.)
You have to remember that we are in to the deepest Intel waters with Oswald and the Assassination...Those deepest waters often harbor the deepest Intel capabilities to match their depth...Kittrell was not the only witness to the Oswald doubles...Helen Forrest said of the Oswald she saw emerge on the Grassy Knoll and get in the Station Wagon "If it wasn't Oswald himself it was his identical twin"...The Oswald whom Forrest saw was Lee, who had just narrowly escaped blowing the whole plan when he stumbled in to the Lobby from the front stairs with Harvey at the other end of the Lobby...These doubles managed to pass themselves off at close range in the Depository and Texas Theater...Bernard Haire thought he was looking at the same person who was taken out the front door...
Don't forget that the Manhattan school records show Harvey in Manhattan at the same time as Lee...This necessitates the Gardos theory to have merit, otherwise the Frantic Caller is just a lunatic who called the Connecticut Tippits with precise information out of the blue with nothing behind it...But we know already that there isn't nothing behind it because of those school records...I submit that the Belarus accent Marina detected on Oswald was actually a western Russian accent common to the Belarus/Ukrainian area that borders directly on Hungary...I have made that point several times now and see it has never once been recognized...This research community is for the shits and once a nincompoop like Gordon bans you the other researchers use that unfair censorship to ignore your good points...None of Oswald's fellow Marines ever saw him studying Berlitz Russian language books...Harvey had a Manhattan-like intellectual interest in high Russian literature that did not come from the poor southern background of the New Orleans Oswald family...It is exactly the type of urbane intellectual education a Manhattan-located kid would learn...When countered with Lee's early promotion of communism as an agent provocateur kid, we are well past the point of Intel accidentally finding out these cousins looked like each other and getting word to Dulles - which is ridiculous and Hargrove should realize it...That early sheep-dipping bespeaks a plan that started from its origin with the birth of the twins...Kids selling themselves as commies is Deep Water stuff that bespeaks a greater Oswald Project plan...
Greg Parker is notorious and should only be referenced with extreme disclaimers on any technical matter where he might be correct on that isolated individual point of evidence...Otherwise he is a highly destructive force and ROKC Troll Farm disinformationist who hosted the Prayer Man theory and kept it up long after it had been credibly disproven...When I presented Greg the evidence of his own website member Linda Zambanini, when she showed Lumpkin did not enter the Depository until 12:50, and therefore could not be the cop Mrs Garner saw with Truly as Parker submitted, Greg ignored it and never admitted that, therefore, the cop was Baker and in turn proved the Lunch Room Encounter was real...Greg was an obnoxious troll and the example of Lumpkin shows he was a bullshit artist who pranked the evidence and looked for false claims he could substitute in for the real evidence...Just about all Parker's "research" is of this nature and he led the charge in fragmenting the credible research community and still has a lot of loyal fans who have no problem being members of Gordon's strictly-moderated Education Forum...Greg Parker is the research community's Alex Jones...UK-based moderatorship uses censorship as a dishonest main tool...
When Sandy Larsen went to Mark Knight and asked him to reinstate me to the Education Forum Knight told him I would never be reinstated because I called Kathy Beckett a bad name...Kathy had obviously gone to Knight and told him "I found something we can keep Doyle off the forum with"...I never broke any rules on the Education Forum and when I asked Gordon to show what rules I had broken he refused and said I would be banned if I asked again...Gordon is a fraud and cowardly bully who abuses his moderator position...No credible moderator would use anything that was said on the unmoderated McAdams website where I called Beckett a "whore" for backing Gordon's wrongful ban (which she was)...Beckett had come over to the McAdams site and taunted me over it which is like kicking a tied up man on the ground...Never has any of those crooks ever answered the main offense of banning an innocent person for posting the correct evidence and then having the ignorant hubris of accusing him of failing to listen to correct evidence procedure when told...That is the main offense here that Knight is obviously making excuses in order to avoid answering for it...The rest of the bum members let them get away with it and pretend not to notice as long as they get posting space...They sell themselves cheaply...This is exactly the kind of arrogant, unfair Education Forum moderation the Deep Politics Forum was formed in opposition to...Get this straight - Gordon says I was banned for failing to obey correct evidence methodology but he himself ignores the correct evidence on Prayer Man and protects people like Odisio and Stancak who ignore my proof and continue to be protected by Gordon in their posting of provably wrong claims...We are talking about my posting on the Education Forum in winter of 2016 when I tried to present the correct evidence on Prayer Man and was bullied and stopped by Gordon, and not the excuses the criminal mods have made since then...They keep me off because that fool Gordon can't answer why failing to obey correct evidence procedure isn't applied to the Lone Nutters who are actually guilty of that, that he goes out of his way to host...Gordon is an arrogant bastard so he doesn't answer questions like that...He just bans... In the future I hope to approach an internet attorney and sue the Forum...Gordon is a dirty bastard...He doesn't stop at just banning an innocent researcher...He uses his authority to go after them and destroy them and his yes-man Knight makes sure he is successful...
Don't forget that the Manhattan school records show Harvey in Manhattan at the same time as Lee...This necessitates the Gardos theory to have merit, otherwise the Frantic Caller is just a lunatic who called the Connecticut Tippits with precise information out of the blue with nothing behind it...But we know already that there isn't nothing behind it because of those school records...I submit that the Belarus accent Marina detected on Oswald was actually a western Russian accent common to the Belarus/Ukrainian area that borders directly on Hungary...I have made that point several times now and see it has never once been recognized...This research community is for the shits and once a nincompoop like Gordon bans you the other researchers use that unfair censorship to ignore your good points...None of Oswald's fellow Marines ever saw him studying Berlitz Russian language books...Harvey had a Manhattan-like intellectual interest in high Russian literature that did not come from the poor southern background of the New Orleans Oswald family...It is exactly the type of urbane intellectual education a Manhattan-located kid would learn...When countered with Lee's early promotion of communism as an agent provocateur kid, we are well past the point of Intel accidentally finding out these cousins looked like each other and getting word to Dulles - which is ridiculous and Hargrove should realize it...That early sheep-dipping bespeaks a plan that started from its origin with the birth of the twins...Kids selling themselves as commies is Deep Water stuff that bespeaks a greater Oswald Project plan...
Greg Parker is notorious and should only be referenced with extreme disclaimers on any technical matter where he might be correct on that isolated individual point of evidence...Otherwise he is a highly destructive force and ROKC Troll Farm disinformationist who hosted the Prayer Man theory and kept it up long after it had been credibly disproven...When I presented Greg the evidence of his own website member Linda Zambanini, when she showed Lumpkin did not enter the Depository until 12:50, and therefore could not be the cop Mrs Garner saw with Truly as Parker submitted, Greg ignored it and never admitted that, therefore, the cop was Baker and in turn proved the Lunch Room Encounter was real...Greg was an obnoxious troll and the example of Lumpkin shows he was a bullshit artist who pranked the evidence and looked for false claims he could substitute in for the real evidence...Just about all Parker's "research" is of this nature and he led the charge in fragmenting the credible research community and still has a lot of loyal fans who have no problem being members of Gordon's strictly-moderated Education Forum...Greg Parker is the research community's Alex Jones...UK-based moderatorship uses censorship as a dishonest main tool...
When Sandy Larsen went to Mark Knight and asked him to reinstate me to the Education Forum Knight told him I would never be reinstated because I called Kathy Beckett a bad name...Kathy had obviously gone to Knight and told him "I found something we can keep Doyle off the forum with"...I never broke any rules on the Education Forum and when I asked Gordon to show what rules I had broken he refused and said I would be banned if I asked again...Gordon is a fraud and cowardly bully who abuses his moderator position...No credible moderator would use anything that was said on the unmoderated McAdams website where I called Beckett a "whore" for backing Gordon's wrongful ban (which she was)...Beckett had come over to the McAdams site and taunted me over it which is like kicking a tied up man on the ground...Never has any of those crooks ever answered the main offense of banning an innocent person for posting the correct evidence and then having the ignorant hubris of accusing him of failing to listen to correct evidence procedure when told...That is the main offense here that Knight is obviously making excuses in order to avoid answering for it...The rest of the bum members let them get away with it and pretend not to notice as long as they get posting space...They sell themselves cheaply...This is exactly the kind of arrogant, unfair Education Forum moderation the Deep Politics Forum was formed in opposition to...Get this straight - Gordon says I was banned for failing to obey correct evidence methodology but he himself ignores the correct evidence on Prayer Man and protects people like Odisio and Stancak who ignore my proof and continue to be protected by Gordon in their posting of provably wrong claims...We are talking about my posting on the Education Forum in winter of 2016 when I tried to present the correct evidence on Prayer Man and was bullied and stopped by Gordon, and not the excuses the criminal mods have made since then...They keep me off because that fool Gordon can't answer why failing to obey correct evidence procedure isn't applied to the Lone Nutters who are actually guilty of that, that he goes out of his way to host...Gordon is an arrogant bastard so he doesn't answer questions like that...He just bans... In the future I hope to approach an internet attorney and sue the Forum...Gordon is a dirty bastard...He doesn't stop at just banning an innocent researcher...He uses his authority to go after them and destroy them and his yes-man Knight makes sure he is successful...