19-03-2010, 06:56 PM
Quote:I don't hold with Eustace Mullins either. He was far too much on the right, the extreme right even, for my personal tastes.Sorry David, but I prefer to think that the enemy of my enemy is not my friend. I'd also submit that people in the intelligence field who contribute to the type of research discussed here don't necessarily do it out of largesse or the egalitarian desire to liberate secret knowledge. Not all of them anyway. Very few, in my view.
However, over the years I have come across a number of people who were able to provide clarity and detailed insights in areas I was researching, simply because they were experts, or at least very knowledgeable, in their field - and many of them also shared politically right views. Some even admired Mullins.
In my experience a great many individuals who operate in the intelligence field seem to naturally lean to the political right. Many are on the far right. One might be forgiven for thinking that this political attitude is almost mandatory for employment in these areas, and when we consider the cold war era, it was a requirement.
The fact is that political correctness is no measure of a person's skill or expertise - it is rather a judgement one makes about their political leanings. You don't have to like them, or get teary together, to acknowledge their professional skills.
If you're trying to persuade the general public that the Kennedy assassination was a deep state sanctioned hit, then you're going to have avoid associating your research with crypto-fascists, period. Cause you lose everyone at that point, aside from the other crypto-fascists. But that's your choice to make.
The larger issue in relation to this thread, however, is this:
Dr. Jim has managed to associate Judyth Baker with chemtrails, moon-landing hoaxes, exotic mega-double-top-secret-super-soldiers, and now a jew hating nutcase.
Way to make your case.
All this while sowing doubt about Armstrong's work. Which he hasn't read.