Judyth Vary Baker: Living in Exile

[Linda Minor]

Dr Fetzer rejects Eustace Mullens because he is not familiar with him. He may be a reliable source or and unreliable source but Jim doesn't know of him to make that judgment yet. This seemed quite clear in his previous post.

Does this not call into question the judgement of Dr. Fetzer's anonymous expert? This person is supposed to be legitimizing Baker somehow, no?

In case anybody needs help, here's Mullins:

The Jews do not want anyone to know what Nazism is. Nazism is simply this -- a proposal that the German people rid themselves of the parasitic Jews. The gentile host dared to protest against the continued presence of the parasite, and attempted to throw it off. It was an ineffectual reaction, because it was emotional and ill-informed.

- Mullens, The Biological Jew

Judyth Vary Baker isn't in good company all of a sudden, is she?

Can Dr. Fetzer decide whether or not Eustace Mullens is a reliable source now? And does this colour his opinion of his "expert" in any way?

Furthermore - why couldn't he just allow Baker's argument to stand on its own?

Heck, I thought we'd already covered this ground once. Revisiting it again and again is tedious and distracting.

David,
Did you ever have any run-ins at Kris Millegan's old research group with Alex Constantine? This reminds me of the same thing that used to happen there back in 1997 and later. Maybe Alex changed his name? Of course I heard that his real name was Dan Rightmyer.
http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listser...07851.html
http://thefreedom.blogtownhall.com/default.aspx

I know Alex did research, of a sort; I even helped him with it and was thanked, along with people on the list, in his book about the death of rock musicians. Adrian Mack also writes reviews of the rock music scene in Canada, Vancouver to be exact.

Deja vu all over again, and again, and again.

http://guttersnipemedia.wordpress.com/20...k-on-milk/

http://guttersnipemedia.wordpress.com/ta...nstantine/