Judyth Vary Baker: Living in Exile

[James H. Fetzer]

Judyth comments on Jack's photograph:

We cannot see how ‘slender’ marguerite actually is in the ‘tall, slender’ photo because
that feature is obscured by the skirts and arms of women on both sides…Look closely
and you will see that the skirt’s actual width is obscured. It is more of an optical
illusion than a verified fact about how ‘slender’ marguerite is in the photo to the right.
Also, in the photo shown for comparison, we have already discussed the creation
of a potbelly due to thyroid disorder syndrome.

Inquires about Armstrong's methodology:

A question Judyth has raised but not sent specifically for posting concerns Armstrong's
methodology. Is it the case, Jack, that Armstrong accepts all the records and photographs
he collected as being true? Because Judyth has noticed some points about Lee in New York,
which, in her opinion, John did not understand. If he ran across a student's report that she
(Judyth) had pee'd in her pants, for example, would he have known that it was actually
mouse urine or taken it at face value?

I have raised this question before but not heard an answer. Since the greater the number of
documents and photographs he collected, the greater the probability that some of them are
forgeries or fakes, what principle or methods did he employ to sort out the authentic from
the inauthentic? As you know from our research together, this case is littered with phony
photos, reports, documents and films. Was it his belief that everything he accumulated
was free from all fault and genuine?

for those who have not read armstrong and who do not believe that there were two marguerites: