29-03-2010, 08:36 AM
Neither photo looks like the Oswald in New Orleans, or in Dallas. In fact, the two photos do not look like each other.
The Angleton abuse of Nosenko (in which I believe Helms participated his denials to the contrary notwithstanding) I always took to be suppression of evidence destructive to the CIA false flag attempt.
That is, the CIA put Nosenko in the brick prison for three years to protect their construct that the assassination was a Soviet-Cuban operation.
That this may have evolved into a "lone nut" act doesn't change the ruse used by Johnson to enlist the Commission members, all that mumbo jumbo about forty million Americans killed in the first thirty minutes.
As to determining who returned--didn't someone fingerprint the returnee and compare it to the record of the Marine.
To me it's always been beyond peradventure of doubt that Lee was part of the penetration program. What's novel here is the suggestion that KGB would not simply try to turn him, but to replace him.
The Angleton abuse of Nosenko (in which I believe Helms participated his denials to the contrary notwithstanding) I always took to be suppression of evidence destructive to the CIA false flag attempt.
That is, the CIA put Nosenko in the brick prison for three years to protect their construct that the assassination was a Soviet-Cuban operation.
That this may have evolved into a "lone nut" act doesn't change the ruse used by Johnson to enlist the Commission members, all that mumbo jumbo about forty million Americans killed in the first thirty minutes.
As to determining who returned--didn't someone fingerprint the returnee and compare it to the record of the Marine.
To me it's always been beyond peradventure of doubt that Lee was part of the penetration program. What's novel here is the suggestion that KGB would not simply try to turn him, but to replace him.