11-04-2010, 03:18 AM
Charles Drago Wrote:John Kowalski Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:John,
Let's feel free to continue this exchange.
I daresay that alleged Sponsors of the assassination have been "identifed" in scores -- if not hundreds -- of books.
Few authors have bothered to propose viable structures for the conspiracy, however, and even fewer have taken the time to understand and define the natures and roles of the institutions and individuals they would indict as sponsors.
A prime example: "The CIA did it!" is as, naive, simple-minded, and even nonsensical a statement as any ever made about the events of 11/22/63.
Charlie
Charles:
Are you suggesting a broad coalition, whose problems could be solved by a common solution, the asassination of JFK, or do you see the US Establishment as a cohesive entity, which isssues edicts from its council chambers?
John
John,
"US Establishment" is a fictive construct in terms of the world-historic events at Dealey Plaza.
The "establishment" in this case is global.
No "council chambers." What we struggle to identify and quantify is far more subtle and encompassing than any novelistic/Hollywood "star chamber" narrative device.
Charles:
I am surprised, this is the first time that I had read anything that suggested that the plot was not solely a US controlled operation.
Khrushchev's downfall related to this in anyway?
Do you believe that intelligence agencies, organized crime, the drug trade being controlled or directed in some way by the sponsors?
Do you have a metaphor to describe this organization?
John