01-05-2010, 04:40 AM
Malcolm Pryce Wrote:Anthony Marsh wrote:
Yes, the professional debunkers lie when they say that "pull it" does not mean controlled demolition. I have been pointing out a PBS special about the science of controlled demolitions where one of the experts explains how they "pull" a building.
But that does not give the 9/11 Truthers the right to lie about what Silverstein said. Yes, he means a controlled demolition of building 7. But that decision was made later in the day when he saw how much damage it had sustained and realized it was better to just write it off as a loss and demolish it. That is a business decision, not conspiracy.
No one decided to pull building 6 before 9/11, but they eventually did.
This won't wash. If the building was demolished by CD it had to have been wired up before 9/11. Therefore it was conspiracy not a business decision. There is no way round it.
These are Larry Silverstein's actual words in the PBS documentary in 2002:
'I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.'
You are begging the question. You are ASSUMING it was a controlled demolition and therefore conspiracy by Silverstein.
And you are putting your own spin on what Silverstein said to puff up your conspiracy theory.
Just the way some kooks bring up a rumor that all the Jews were told not to go into work that morning. Or what about all those diamonds? 20 tons of diamonds missing. Diamonds are the hardest material on Earth and yet no diamonds were found in the rubble. Maybe the conspirators took at the diamonds out the day before and blew up the towers to cover their crime. Like the movie Die Hard. Yeah, that's it. And anyone who doesn't believe that version is just part of the cover-up.