02-05-2010, 09:47 PM
Adrian Mack Wrote:Quote:For a dead end, it has a lot of followers.It does! I understand the attraction. But whenever the MSM attempts to debunk 9/11 research, it focuses on controlled demolition, or "no planes". The MSM has never attempted to examine US govt., military and Intelligence foreknowledge, which goes directly to the heart of 9/11 and is far too dangerous. This is why I think it's distraction and why I can imagine somebody at Fox actively attempting to keep CD on the boil.
Most of the 9/11 Truthers I know split into one of two camps. Either LIHOP which means let it happen on purpose as in Bush/Cheney/necons/intelligence seeing that an attack was planned and let it happen in order to start another war. Or MIHOP which means that group carried out the attack to use the attack as a pretext to start another war. Not leaving in the hands of incompetent terrorists who might screw it up or chicken out.
They often point to the neocon manifesto that in order to get their invasion of Iraq the US would have to suffer another Pearl Harbor. But I point out to them that at Pearl Harbor those were not US pilots flying US planes attacking our own soil. It really was a preemptive strike by our known enemy. Further, it was the final step of a US program to provoke Japan into attacking the US. We intentionally provoked Japan to attack us to rally the public to enter the war. It worked.
I believe the same is true for 9/11. The Pentagon has a special section which has the mission of provoking other countries and terrorist groups into attacking the US. Osama Bin Laden authorized the terrorist attack by al Qaeda. I don't know why, but some people have a tendency to get a little annoyed when you try to assassinate him 129 times and kill his children and friends.
So I see 9/11 as another case of PIHOP, provoked it on purpose.