26-05-2010, 11:40 PM
Tosh Plumlee Wrote:Let me get something straight right now in reference to Captain Edward G Seiwell of the Fourth Army Dallas Texas. Jay Harrison was the only researcher who talked with Seiwell after I gave him his location when I found him living in Dallas with his daughter. After, I had located him after many years of searching, I went and talked to him (Seiwell) and asked him if it was OK for Jay to interview him.
I also asked him if any other researchers had contacted him in the past years. His answer was; NO. I asked him if Jim Marrs had contacted him. His answer NO ... and Peter I ask if you had contacted him... again NO. I asked if Larry Hancock had contacted him again, NO. AND TOO, I asked if anyone from Oliver Stone had contacted him... again NO. Now I had told all these people about him and where he could be found. NADA. Now in my view there was no follow up from anybody after I gave them the information to confirm various matters concerning activities of the 4th Army Dallas, Love Field. To me that research was not done or followed up on...If there was any type of follow up or research it was very limited ... it was flat lazy sloopy follow up work at best. Or it could have been that nobody believed me, including you and Jim...The only one who did believe me and did detail follow up work was JAY HARRISON..
Jay Harrison was the only researcher who took the time and did the leg work to track him down from my information and interviewed him on tape. I was there and I have a copy of that tape. This was many years after I had told Jim Marrs and You too, Peter where Seiwell was and how to get in touch with him... You and Jim and even Oliver Stone and Joe West DID NOT EVEN TRY to talk to him. As well as Larry Hancock. Now that Seiwell is dead (91 years old) You people come out of the wood work and claim things that are not true. You feel that some owe you their hard earned work.
The whole matter of Jays work and that of Seiwells's is a damn good example of twisting the facts that makes me so damn touche about the qualifications of so called researchers. After the man is DEAD then you want his material Seiwell's as well as JAY's.. And some of you feel it is owed to you for the sake of history. BS I lived it... Jay researched it.. It was and is for this very reason that I told Walt "Not to give any of Jays material concerning Me to ANYONE without my consent"...
Jay got a lot of background on my family and what my father did in the War years for Uncle Sam and the OSS, at Love Field. Jay was damn good at what he did. So again I say I want nothing more to do with the investigations into JFK. And too, I do not want anymore of my personal life passed around for others to twist and fit into their wild theories about how things really went down in Dallas... I tried to point researchers to the location of many facts which could be established but most could not get past their egos and pet theories to really go and look. The Seiwell case is a perfect example. If what I had to say did not jive with others preconcieved ideas and speculations, then I was the one who was Wrong. And too, I was called a liar and a fabricator with a wild story by some of these so called "EXPERTS".
Now, you can sent this reply to Walt. So get off his case and that of mine... Capt Edward G Seiwell is dead and gone... you missed out and nothing you can say or do will change that. You Peter and others have screwed the record up for the last time, in my view. By the way where is the 'Wilson" material promised many years ago? Where is all the secret stuff that you and you alone uncovered? "....but can't tell at this time..to hush hush". All of you from this quarter Look at yourselves. Patheic.
Tosh I am astounded at this post. Yesterday was the 5th anniversary of Jay's death. I was just about to post something but was trying to get to the end of the posts and saw this! What about all the times you called ME and asked me to contact Walt? I contacted him at your request more than a dozen times. Have you now told Walt to have no contact with me as well? I have no clue what your beef with Peter is, and don't want to get involved in it, but when I was contacting Walt you wanted Peter to have certain things. I find this switcharoo quite perplexing. I know you and Jay were friends for decades, and I only 8 years, but we spoke daily, dozens of times.
Yesterday he was on my mind a lot but I was in court all day and had no time to get to the computer.
Anyway ....Jay is rolling over in his grave as he TRUSTED Walt with is life's work and it's being buried and now you seem to be assisting in said burial.
And since Walt has tried to embarras me here, on my own forum I can finally state the truth for the record: I never tursted him from day one. With good reason. He told me two lies the day we met. It was the Sunday after the 5/29/98 Dallas press conference. The day they wer both so mad at Richard for telling John Kelin Nathan Darby's name. In the context of who I was and how I fit into the case I mentioned Boston and the AIB.. Walt Brown then told me that he had "shared the stage with Carl Oglesby in Boston in 1975 at the first ever conference" of this nature. Then he told me that Carl Oglesby was one of his best friends. I knew the first thing was a lie because I was at that entire conference and if Mr. Brown was there he was there as an attendee, not a speaker. So soon's I came home I called MY close friend Carl and asked him one question: "What is your opinion of Walt Brown?" His reply: "Who's Walt Brown?" Walt can now seek to call me some sort of liar but there were witnesses to this conversation with whom I am still in contact.
RIP Jay, I miss you.