Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Oswald leaflets USS Wasp
#1
Is this correct? Summer '63, Wasp in port at NO and Oswald stood on the pier and leafletted the sailors coming off the ship to go on liberty? I assume if true, the leaflets were of the "Hands Off Cuba, Viva Fidel" type.

Just checking here, working on a theory.
Reply
#2
Yes. This was Oswald's first attempt to pick a fight over his "pro-Castro position." He had acquired the leaflets, and the stamp kit used to mark them, a few days before.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply
#3
All part of the Banister provocateur work. Those leaflets would be worth a pretty penny now.
Reply
#4
Here's the part that puzzles me: Why didn't the sailors and marines arriving on the pier pound Oswald into jelly and throw him into the bay? He was trying to pass out "COMMUNIST" Pro Castro material, for crying out loud!

Banister thought he was going to get a positive response from these guys??? Puhleeeez.::facepalm::
Reply
#5
I would hazard a guess that the activity was intended to produce a whupping and attract media attention, allowing Oswald to build his street cred as a pro-Castro guy.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply
#6
Just like they did with the Bringuier group.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the Government's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 262 10-12-2023, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Govenment's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part II Gil Jesus 1 299 28-11-2023, 03:36 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's case against Oswald is BS --- Part I Gil Jesus 1 332 15-11-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Thomas Kelley reports Oswald said he did not view parade Richard Gilbride 1 352 26-09-2023, 04:31 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 370 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The REAL reason Oswald went to Irving on 11.21.63 Gil Jesus 1 462 15-06-2023, 03:46 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Conclusion Gil Jesus 1 609 01-04-2023, 04:23 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Part IV Gil Jesus 0 445 26-03-2023, 02:10 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Oswald and the Shot at Walker Jim DiEugenio 1 565 24-03-2023, 04:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 493 15-03-2023, 11:34 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)