14-12-2010, 07:15 PM
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Charles - even acknowledging your wise caveats in post #13, the implications of this information are huge.
Indeed.
My source is no longer accessible to me, alas. As I think about that long-ago conversation, I'm reminded of how he/she stressed that Webster routinely feigned the inability to speak cogently (or at all), but that he was vocal, alert, and apparently competent when he chose to be with the few people he liked (and perhaps even trusted).
I among others view the Webster story as it is commonly held among researchers to be the Rosetta Stone for LHO/intel relations. But it very well could lead us deeper into some of the most heavily guarded areas of JFK-related skullduggery -- including Harvey and Lee doppelganger ops and most significantly Evica's "treasonous cabal" territory.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene