16-12-2010, 03:02 PM
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:Jan Klimkowski Wrote:My suspicion is that as the progress of Webster and Oswald was watched, monitored, minutely scrutinized, it became clear that they provided different opportunities to those intent on using them.
Rand dealt in Ones and Zeroes....
The process is dynamic. Your insight is quite valuable, Jan.
And by "process" in this instance I mean the development of the nurtured, shaped, controlled, but by inescapable definition never one hundred percent predictable human experiments.
Yes.
The limited hangout version of MK-ULTRA (in the broad sense signifying all covert mind control experimentation) claims that the aim was to create a "Manchurian Candidate", defined essentially as a remotely controlled assassin.
That may or may not have been the aim. However, I do not believe that the Sponsors (in your terminology) would ever have relied on a remotely controlled assassin to execute their selected target.
I also do not believe that the mind technology ever produced a 100% reliable remotely controlled assassin.
However, MK-ULTRA probably did learn how to use narco-hypno-trauma conditioning to get subject A to location B to perform act C (eg pull a trigger) at time D.
Individual subjects would have been more, or less, responsive to their programming, and had more or less "bleed" (memory leakage).
Within this framework, the construct of the "Manchurian Candidate", can be seen as a meme, originally meaningful, then used in a psyop, and now a key part of the limited hangout.
Charles Drago Wrote:The East v. West conflict paradigm -- the Darkest Charade.
Putin croaks Blueberry Hill
It would appear that they did so rely with Sirhan Sirhan. Not saying that there was not steady back up, if Sirhan and the real shooter (Thane Eugene Cesar) did not act according to plan. I would like to know more about Cesar, if he was also a MKULTRA subject. That he lived leads me to believe that he was also some sort of Manchurian Candiadate.
Dawn