26-01-2011, 10:27 AM
I've known Daniel a lot longer than 911 and I consider this to be pure nonsense.
It's also very poorly put together, imo. Naive and uninformed.
Daniel has never hidden his professional past. He got sacked for trying to make penetrating documentaries long before 911 was on the horizon.
This is simply an ill-inspired "hit job", I think.
So my question is this: who actually wrote this piece? Is there a link to the actual piece Peter?
It's also very poorly put together, imo. Naive and uninformed.
Daniel has never hidden his professional past. He got sacked for trying to make penetrating documentaries long before 911 was on the horizon.
This is simply an ill-inspired "hit job", I think.
So my question is this: who actually wrote this piece? Is there a link to the actual piece Peter?