Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?

[Albert Doyle]

Albert, as John Costella explains in his tutorial on the faking of the film, which I
infer you have still not viewed, the blood spray dissipates too quickly to be real.

With all due respect, I don't think you're answering my points.


You can't have an event that blows the skull flap open without an accompanying blood burst event.


The skull pieces seen flying in the whitish jet are real because we have evidence of them being found later in the direction they were seen flying in. This forensically corroborates an explosive event.


You are suggesting a frangible bullet exploded underneath the skull flap and pushed it open. However exploding bullet behavior makes it highly unlikely that a full 180 degree hemisphere above the point of explosion would not experience some significant fragment shrapnel that would blast through the skull above it. This would create fragmenting damage where the skull was blown to bits instead of the clean flap that was later closed back over and not noticed at Parkland. It would be more likely that a back to front-traveling bullet shot from behind would pass underneath the skull and not damage it as was seen. In short, the clean, undamaged parietal part of hair seen at Parkland does not match the damage from and exploding bullet to the temple in my opinion.



.