28-01-2011, 10:39 PM
OK. We're talking about the medical evidence, not the Zapruder film. You think
that the skull flap had to have been blow open by the back of the head shot and
not by the frangible bullet. We know the bullet was frangible from the metallic
particles found in the lateral cranial X-ray. But if the skull flap had been blown
open BEFORE the frangile bullet exploded, it would have blown cerebral tissue
out of the side of his head, which would not have included cerebellar. But that,
I take it, did not happen. I know the Newmans saw what was exposed when the
skull flap was blown open, but surely if brains had been blown out of it, it would
not have closed back up so neatly. Tell me more about the hair at Parkland. I
am not sure I have heard that described before. What is your source about that?
that the skull flap had to have been blow open by the back of the head shot and
not by the frangible bullet. We know the bullet was frangible from the metallic
particles found in the lateral cranial X-ray. But if the skull flap had been blown
open BEFORE the frangile bullet exploded, it would have blown cerebral tissue
out of the side of his head, which would not have included cerebellar. But that,
I take it, did not happen. I know the Newmans saw what was exposed when the
skull flap was blown open, but surely if brains had been blown out of it, it would
not have closed back up so neatly. Tell me more about the hair at Parkland. I
am not sure I have heard that described before. What is your source about that?
Albert Doyle Wrote:James H. Fetzer Wrote:Albert, as John Costella explains in his tutorial on the faking of the film, which I
infer you have still not viewed, the blood spray dissipates too quickly to be real.
With all due respect, I don't think you're answering my points.
You can't have an event that blows the skull flap open without an accompanying blood burst event.
The skull pieces seen flying in the whitish jet are real because we have evidence of them being found later in the direction they were seen flying in. This forensically corroborates an explosive event.
You are suggesting a frangible bullet exploded underneath the skull flap and pushed it open. However exploding bullet behavior makes it highly unlikely that a full 180 degree hemisphere above the point of explosion would not experience some significant fragment shrapnel that would blast through the skull above it. This would create fragmenting damage where the skull was blown to bits instead of the clean flap that was later closed back over and not noticed at Parkland. It would be more likely that a back to front-traveling bullet shot from behind would pass underneath the skull and not damage it as was seen. In short, the clean, undamaged parietal part of hair seen at Parkland does not match the damage from and exploding bullet to the temple in my opinion.