16-02-2011, 12:08 AM
If I recall correctly Abe had been a promoter of Wood for quite some time and does it on other 911 discussion fora.
Peter Presland cited several sources that note than hundreds of thousands of tons of steel were removed and therefore were not dustified.
There as much as 170,000 pounds of freon stored at the site which I am led to believe when heated can release hydrofluoric or hydrochloric acid which is extremely caustic.
The twin towers contained thousands of substances, chemicals which interacted mechanically and in some cases chemical in the process of the towers being destroyed. And there was also combustion which is evidenced by massive amount of smoke seen before they came down which itself created enormous heat from friction. The dust and gases and noxious smoke propagated away from the bottom of all three collapses affecting many blocks around the site and polluting the air. Of course we were told the air was safe to breathe, one lie among many.
The collapse of a building of 500,000 tons has never happened before and certainly not in a 10-15 seconds highly energetic event. This was a first and had produced all sorts of things never seen before, hard to understand intuitively and have the physical evidence removed makes it that much harder. We do have science and engineering as a foundation to build upon the limited number of videos, physical samples, data collected and witness accounts. And as I have tried to point out we do need to study in detail the structure to both see how they fell and how someone who wanted them to fall could exploited the weakest part of the structure.
Clearly there have been many attempts to advance theories based on what the evidence shows. And all observations need to be accounted for ultimately, not the evidence fixed around the theory.
Peter Presland cited several sources that note than hundreds of thousands of tons of steel were removed and therefore were not dustified.
There as much as 170,000 pounds of freon stored at the site which I am led to believe when heated can release hydrofluoric or hydrochloric acid which is extremely caustic.
The twin towers contained thousands of substances, chemicals which interacted mechanically and in some cases chemical in the process of the towers being destroyed. And there was also combustion which is evidenced by massive amount of smoke seen before they came down which itself created enormous heat from friction. The dust and gases and noxious smoke propagated away from the bottom of all three collapses affecting many blocks around the site and polluting the air. Of course we were told the air was safe to breathe, one lie among many.
The collapse of a building of 500,000 tons has never happened before and certainly not in a 10-15 seconds highly energetic event. This was a first and had produced all sorts of things never seen before, hard to understand intuitively and have the physical evidence removed makes it that much harder. We do have science and engineering as a foundation to build upon the limited number of videos, physical samples, data collected and witness accounts. And as I have tried to point out we do need to study in detail the structure to both see how they fell and how someone who wanted them to fall could exploited the weakest part of the structure.
Clearly there have been many attempts to advance theories based on what the evidence shows. And all observations need to be accounted for ultimately, not the evidence fixed around the theory.