Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?
#63
Thank You!
Greg Burnham Wrote:Jim,

It is with mixed feelings that I come away from your account. It is truly well written and impeccably reasoned, yet haunting--since even its most basic implication is highly disturbing. But, even though the emotional price paid for knowing the truth is sometimes costly, knowing the truth is nevertheless cheap at twice the price.

The mountain of evidence now available to the public, and certainly available to the media, is more than sufficient to prove the case for conspiracy several hundred times over. Still, deception persists and the hood-winking of the American public remains the order of the day.

The question is, of course, "Why?" - The motivation for such malfeasance can no longer be reasonably assumed to be due to the perpetrators of a 47 year old crime still attempting to "get away with it" -- as the vast majority of those directly involved in its commission DID get away with it long ago and many, if not most, of them are deceased! Therefore, the ongoing cover-up must be related to "getting away with something" currently. And what is that "thing" that is so important to keep hidden from the light? What is it that would be revealed to the American citizen and to citizens around the world by this truth coming out?

To paraphrase L Fletcher Prouty as "Man X" in the movie JFK: "Why was Kennedy killed? Who benefitted? Who has the power to cover it up?"

I think the answer to those questions are still of paramount importance today. I further believe the answers are not nearly as illusive as many people have been brain-washed into believing. Perhaps the main issue for those continuing to obstruct justice has more to do with controlling the collective consciousness of the population than it has to do with impunity for the commission of a past crime.

If ever an admission is forthcoming as to the true nature of the events of November 22, 1963 in Dallas it is feared that a "revolution" of MIND will take place. Such a revolution in thinking will free the American people from the bonds of deception and restore to them a government of, by and for WE THE PEOPLE. Such knowledge is seen as dangerous not only for its catalytic effect, but also for the cathartic ramifications it would have on the establishment.

We the people would very likely clean house...and THAT is something to be feared by those in power.

Excellent work, Jim!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film? - by LR Trotter - 28-02-2011, 07:54 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DARNELL film Original Richard Gilbride 8 385 23-11-2024, 07:34 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Sarah Stanton (i.e. PrayerMan) in Dan Owens film Richard Gilbride 7 2,152 01-10-2023, 03:25 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Manipulation of TOWNER film David Josephs 0 2,306 26-11-2019, 06:48 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  Deep Truth Journal: First Issue Jim DiEugenio 0 5,052 29-12-2018, 09:29 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Kavanaugh helped to keep the Truth of JFK assassination buried with CIA. Peter Lemkin 4 13,087 10-09-2018, 08:41 PM
Last Post: James Lateer
  Fiction is Stranger than Truth Lauren Johnson 1 18,016 27-07-2018, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Hill at Oak Cliff Milo Reech 13 14,241 27-01-2018, 06:44 PM
Last Post: Milo Reech
  Nov. 22 radio interviews with me and Alexandra Zapruder Joseph McBride 21 20,336 11-05-2017, 05:18 AM
Last Post: Tom Scully
  Did Dillard film American-born LEE Oswald on sixth floor? Jim Hargrove 9 9,522 12-04-2017, 05:02 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  J Norwood: "Lee Harvey Oswald: The Legend and the Truth" Jim Hargrove 12 10,021 04-04-2017, 03:02 PM
Last Post: Jim Hargrove

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)