04-04-2011, 12:11 PM
"Nine Iron" Walker's patterns of lies and disruptions regarding my activity at the EF lead me to the informed opinion that he was knowingly active in an effort to drive me from that forum.
His motivations remain, for me, unclear. Was it a personal vendetta? A misguided and even perverted attempt to protect his turf? A campaign directed by deep political entities?
My posts too are gone -- not as many as those authored by Peter, but certainly numbering in the high three-figures.
But what gives away the Walker game is the manner in which he banned my Internet address and then denied he had done so.
As soon as I used a friend's computer to create a post in which I disclosed these actions, that address too was denied access.
When I posed the rhetorical question, "Why?", Walker replied with a single word:
"Think."
Next the "Colby" entity appeared on cue to call into question my truthfulness.
Through all of these transparently hostile acts, the great John Simkin remained silent.
Simkin gets "Colby" and Burton, and he richly deserves them.
Gifted scholars and investigators still post at EF. They would be wise to ask themselves if their support of what in my opinion is Simkin's thoroughly penetrated and controlled venture amounts to giving aid and comfort to the enemy -- including the killers of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
What good has come from EF?
EF's greatest sin: It perpetuates debates on issues long settled, and thus powerfully supports the enemy's ultimate agenda item.
His motivations remain, for me, unclear. Was it a personal vendetta? A misguided and even perverted attempt to protect his turf? A campaign directed by deep political entities?
My posts too are gone -- not as many as those authored by Peter, but certainly numbering in the high three-figures.
But what gives away the Walker game is the manner in which he banned my Internet address and then denied he had done so.
As soon as I used a friend's computer to create a post in which I disclosed these actions, that address too was denied access.
When I posed the rhetorical question, "Why?", Walker replied with a single word:
"Think."
Next the "Colby" entity appeared on cue to call into question my truthfulness.
Through all of these transparently hostile acts, the great John Simkin remained silent.
Simkin gets "Colby" and Burton, and he richly deserves them.
Gifted scholars and investigators still post at EF. They would be wise to ask themselves if their support of what in my opinion is Simkin's thoroughly penetrated and controlled venture amounts to giving aid and comfort to the enemy -- including the killers of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
What good has come from EF?
EF's greatest sin: It perpetuates debates on issues long settled, and thus powerfully supports the enemy's ultimate agenda item.